Vet the questions really well. I've seen a lot of people posting questions that were already debunked. If she has those to cherry pick, then she probably will.
Example: Why do you call babies hotards?
But it at least very much so appears that jimmycommet and joewills are calling each other hotards, not the baby.
I don't know. I don't talk to people that way, I don't understand it. But in the back and forth, they are addressing each other. It looks like he gets called hotard, and then he says hotard, then specifies afterwards that it is @ the other person. Even if we agree that in general there is a lot of suspicious shit and a lot of smoke with these people, if someone were to hone in on that specific example, like tunnel-vision it, they could easily convince people that it's just back and forth and not directed at the baby, because that is what it looks like. So if someone is like "ASK HIM WHY HE CALLS BABIES HOTARDS" then the interviewer can cherry pick that, hone in on it, and be like, "See, they are calling each other hotards," and the whole investigation is successfully smeared.
I grew up with extremely manipulative, dysfunctional, abusive parents. Both of them. I know how the enemy thinks. I might not be the brightest person, and I might not be very useful in most regards. But damn do I know how the enemy thinks. I'm just trying to give an advanced warning.
view the rest of the comments →
SheSaidDestroy ago
Vet the questions really well. I've seen a lot of people posting questions that were already debunked. If she has those to cherry pick, then she probably will.
Example: Why do you call babies hotards?
But it at least very much so appears that jimmycommet and joewills are calling each other hotards, not the baby.
Need to really be on the ball right now.
SIMONBARROW ago
Why would they call each other "hotard"? It makes no sense in the context.
SheSaidDestroy ago
I don't know. I don't talk to people that way, I don't understand it. But in the back and forth, they are addressing each other. It looks like he gets called hotard, and then he says hotard, then specifies afterwards that it is @ the other person. Even if we agree that in general there is a lot of suspicious shit and a lot of smoke with these people, if someone were to hone in on that specific example, like tunnel-vision it, they could easily convince people that it's just back and forth and not directed at the baby, because that is what it looks like. So if someone is like "ASK HIM WHY HE CALLS BABIES HOTARDS" then the interviewer can cherry pick that, hone in on it, and be like, "See, they are calling each other hotards," and the whole investigation is successfully smeared.
I grew up with extremely manipulative, dysfunctional, abusive parents. Both of them. I know how the enemy thinks. I might not be the brightest person, and I might not be very useful in most regards. But damn do I know how the enemy thinks. I'm just trying to give an advanced warning.