You have to understand that this topic can bring up a lot of emotion for a long of reasons. When a person realizes that this is happening they can go into all kinds of reaction. When they discover the full level of what's happening it might bring out even more stuff.
I know it did for me.
By saying that you're not allowing people to be real with their emotion on such a sensitive topic -- I can't support that at all.
I think a person generally knows when someone is genuine or not.
You also have to understand that the stats of sexual abuse is very high, and there may be people on board who feel a personal connection on some level of past experience of abuse.
I purposely wrote the words, "you have to understand". How did it make you feel when I said you have to do something?
Isn't that the same censorship here on a small scale as what's being exerpeinced to alt-media from mainstream legacy media?
Why you wanna drone and zombie the emotions of genuine people on a real emotional topic?
I do understand that statement. You telling me "you have to understand" didn't put me off at all, because I don't actually have to do anything, even if you tell me to. I'm not telling people to have zero emotional input. I'm telling people to learn how to have a grown-up and thoughtful discussion on the issues rather than spewing the hate you see in this comments section, which I personally find unproductive. The trolls that are trying to throw off this conversation know who they are. They have every right to say stupid things, the point that I'm trying to make is that these people are making us look like idiots.
A good example of a well thought out response is the one you wrote here. We can have disagreements and still have a fair conversation at the same time.
You have a right to say what you think; it's the beauty of a free speech forum. However, telling people how to use their speech is arrogant. You're not the God of users. The beauty of pizzagate is that you have people from all different backgrounds and political affiliations participating in an online investigation to protect children. We all have different world views, but what is legitimate is what we bring to the investigation regardless of rhetoric. At this point, worrying about what msm thinks is a fucking fruitless endeavor. They've painted this investigation, and it doesn't matter how many pretty words you use, they dismissed it long ago. Ask yourself what is the merit in censoring rhetoric if a post uses language that you don't agree with but it also exposes evidence that leads to a breakthrough. Appearances don't equate to worth.
I have been known to write a one sentence rant including the words "those f'ers", but I narrowly escaped abduction as a child, so when I start to recognize a little too much internal emotion I log off and take a walk.
view the rest of the comments →
cosmicmind ago
You have to understand that this topic can bring up a lot of emotion for a long of reasons. When a person realizes that this is happening they can go into all kinds of reaction. When they discover the full level of what's happening it might bring out even more stuff. I know it did for me. By saying that you're not allowing people to be real with their emotion on such a sensitive topic -- I can't support that at all. I think a person generally knows when someone is genuine or not.
You also have to understand that the stats of sexual abuse is very high, and there may be people on board who feel a personal connection on some level of past experience of abuse.
I purposely wrote the words, "you have to understand". How did it make you feel when I said you have to do something?
Isn't that the same censorship here on a small scale as what's being exerpeinced to alt-media from mainstream legacy media?
Why you wanna drone and zombie the emotions of genuine people on a real emotional topic?
anonymousgate ago
I do understand that statement. You telling me "you have to understand" didn't put me off at all, because I don't actually have to do anything, even if you tell me to. I'm not telling people to have zero emotional input. I'm telling people to learn how to have a grown-up and thoughtful discussion on the issues rather than spewing the hate you see in this comments section, which I personally find unproductive. The trolls that are trying to throw off this conversation know who they are. They have every right to say stupid things, the point that I'm trying to make is that these people are making us look like idiots.
A good example of a well thought out response is the one you wrote here. We can have disagreements and still have a fair conversation at the same time.
Faustian ago
You have a right to say what you think; it's the beauty of a free speech forum. However, telling people how to use their speech is arrogant. You're not the God of users. The beauty of pizzagate is that you have people from all different backgrounds and political affiliations participating in an online investigation to protect children. We all have different world views, but what is legitimate is what we bring to the investigation regardless of rhetoric. At this point, worrying about what msm thinks is a fucking fruitless endeavor. They've painted this investigation, and it doesn't matter how many pretty words you use, they dismissed it long ago. Ask yourself what is the merit in censoring rhetoric if a post uses language that you don't agree with but it also exposes evidence that leads to a breakthrough. Appearances don't equate to worth.
cosmicmind ago
Thanks for the explanation.
I have been known to write a one sentence rant including the words "those f'ers", but I narrowly escaped abduction as a child, so when I start to recognize a little too much internal emotion I log off and take a walk.
I get your point now.