And that's giving you the HUGE benefit of the doubt that this isn't just some slide bullshit tactic that goes hand in hand with the derailing tactic you're whining about.
Here's the logic.
You're mad about crazy stuff and meanie words distracting from the truth.
So you've made a thread to bitch about the crazy stuff and meanie words.
So now this thread is on the front page, diluting the content of this site. That's one thread of possible investigation that isn't on the front page now.
And it will not work. Because the shills are here specifically to do what you're whining about.
So now there's them derailing AND you diluting.
Which begs the question, are you such a fucking newb that you don't understand this or are you collaborating with the shills to stir outrage because nobody here gives a fuck about meanie words and crazies and the derailing hasn't been working?
Either way you're being unproductive, distracting, and a moron. And there's always the chance you're actually being paid to cover for kiddie diddlers by David Brock.
@kingkongwaswrong op is concern trolling why the living nigger fuck is this tagged "IMPORTANT"?!?!
there's a big fucking difference between hate speech (protected in the u.s as free speech) and violent speech (like threats, not protected, crimes)
because having a feeling (i hate fat people/niggers/people who jaywalk) is not a fucking crime, but threatening their lives/livelihoods for whatever reason IS a crime (on the net as well).
roping them in together is a known tactic of disinformation agents / shills.
QUOTING OP:
We need to have absolutely zero tolerance for violent or hateful speech here.
come on man, do you really think OP is that sinister? Maybe Im naive but I think that he's just conflating two things that are pretty similar in most peoples minds.
If you want him to change it to just violent speech, why dont you just ask him nicely in a direct response, and outline your arguement. I get what you're saying now, but you're getting lost in the retarded voatgoat response of 'faggot cocksucker nigger' etc
view the rest of the comments →
grlldcheese ago
Language Nazism doesn't work here.
And that's giving you the HUGE benefit of the doubt that this isn't just some slide bullshit tactic that goes hand in hand with the derailing tactic you're whining about.
Here's the logic.
You're mad about crazy stuff and meanie words distracting from the truth.
So you've made a thread to bitch about the crazy stuff and meanie words.
So now this thread is on the front page, diluting the content of this site. That's one thread of possible investigation that isn't on the front page now.
And it will not work. Because the shills are here specifically to do what you're whining about.
So now there's them derailing AND you diluting.
Which begs the question, are you such a fucking newb that you don't understand this or are you collaborating with the shills to stir outrage because nobody here gives a fuck about meanie words and crazies and the derailing hasn't been working?
Either way you're being unproductive, distracting, and a moron. And there's always the chance you're actually being paid to cover for kiddie diddlers by David Brock.
Suck a fucking dick.
Edit: tfw the fire rises.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
why in the fuck is this tagged important, though?
@kingkongwaswrong op is concern trolling why the living nigger fuck is this tagged "IMPORTANT"?!?!
there's a big fucking difference between hate speech (protected in the u.s as free speech) and violent speech (like threats, not protected, crimes)
because having a feeling (i hate fat people/niggers/people who jaywalk) is not a fucking crime, but threatening their lives/livelihoods for whatever reason IS a crime (on the net as well).
roping them in together is a known tactic of disinformation agents / shills.
QUOTING OP:
kingkongwaswrong ago
Is he not allowed to say that? O_O who's censoring who?
Did you even read his post? or just saw that comment and went spacko?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
he can say it all he wants
and i'll continue to call it concern shilling because that's what it is, paid for or not.
if he said
"we need to have absolutely zero tolerance for violent speech"
I WOULD AGREE.
because threatening people and calling for violence against people (or orgs, etc) is illegal!
i think it goes without saying, but hey some may say it bears repeating.
but he's - again, now pay attention here, because this is the trick - he's ROPING IN LEGALLY PROTECTED FREE SPEECH (HATE SPEECH) WITH ILLEGAL SPEECH.
and suggesting that
did you even read my comment?
kingkongwaswrong ago
come on man, do you really think OP is that sinister? Maybe Im naive but I think that he's just conflating two things that are pretty similar in most peoples minds.
If you want him to change it to just violent speech, why dont you just ask him nicely in a direct response, and outline your arguement. I get what you're saying now, but you're getting lost in the retarded voatgoat response of 'faggot cocksucker nigger' etc
SaneGoatiSwear ago
lol welcome to voat
we had hillary clinton's CTR here for a while.
paid shills, en masse. organized and shilling for the parkinson's riddled treasonus cunt.
clear as day
yeah again he can say whatever he wants
i just said what i wanted to say.
that's a horrible way to say it, it's: 'you cocksucking niggerfaggot!'