Third time posting, after some kerfluffles with the mods. In the illustration we see a baby, a cloud of gas with a heart in it (a fart) and a man's butt and phallus.
In spanish the word for fart is 'pedo' and a word for penis is 'falo'
Together this would appear to spell out pedofalo, which is extremely close to the word 'pedofilo' (pedophile)
The illustration strongly suggests the concept baby loves pedophile.
Joshua Ryan Vogelsong has been confirmed to be a CPP employee per this thread highlighting confirmed participants https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1439146
@Phobos_Mothership
Not saying there is anything behind its removal. I will follow posting rules from now on just wanted to share something significant imo
An archive is always better than a screen shot. I totally believe you and don't doubt you for a second. But a naysayer could argue that image was photoshopped. Just sayin'.
That's not how Occam's razor works.
Logic only has a preference for simplicity because it's harder for us to test complex hypotheses. In many cases, the most popular theories have the least amount of assumptions because they can be falsifiably tested.
There's not a lot of assumption that has to be made for the image.
It's a picture of a guy with a boner, farting on the face of what appears to be a toddler with the caption: "True love".
I would argue that the vast majority who saw this image would likely find it strange or upsetting, to say the least.
There are more assumptions when you hypothesize that the image represents a pictograph of body parts that when translated from Spanish to English, sorta resembles the word "Pedophile".
I'm not going to say you're wrong because I don't have to translate this thing from Spanish to see the context of the image, which is "Children give El Pedo a boner."
EDIT:
@reasonedandinformed You better back it up. What the fuck is caution trolling? And can you show me where it applies to my post? I literally said the same shit as everyone else and agreed that this is some sick shit... but apparently I'm CTR? Okay. Whatever your paranoid mind comes up with, bud.
But seriously, what the fuck does that mean? I wanna know. Like, legit. Seems you know an awful lot about CTR and some of us are just casual observers, trying to piece all this shit together. But you wanna throw me under the bus for what reason? No wonder people on this sub call you a shill, dude... you're all over the place.
view the rest of the comments →
terrordactyl ago
Third time posting, after some kerfluffles with the mods. In the illustration we see a baby, a cloud of gas with a heart in it (a fart) and a man's butt and phallus.
In spanish the word for fart is 'pedo' and a word for penis is 'falo'
Together this would appear to spell out pedofalo, which is extremely close to the word 'pedofilo' (pedophile)
The illustration strongly suggests the concept baby loves pedophile.
Joshua Ryan Vogelsong has been confirmed to be a CPP employee per this thread highlighting confirmed participants https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1439146
Joshuas facebook page where you can see he is friends with Alefantis and other CPP employees: https://www.facebook.com/joshua.vogelsong
His pictures are now set to private, but luckily we were able to archive this. credit to @shillbertdinkleberry for the find.
AJ-Styles ago
gee nice photo Joshua...
LostandFound ago
Given Alefantis name is of Greek / Italian origin its not really that much of a stretch.
smokratez ago
Which mod was pushing against this from being posted to this sub?
shillbertdinkleberry ago
@Phobos_Mothership Not saying there is anything behind its removal. I will follow posting rules from now on just wanted to share something significant imo
DarkMath ago
"we were able to archive"....Where's the link to the archive?
Orange_Circle ago
https://archive.is/bH4Rk
terrordactyl ago
I misspoke. We got a screenshot, not an archive.
DarkMath ago
An archive is always better than a screen shot. I totally believe you and don't doubt you for a second. But a naysayer could argue that image was photoshopped. Just sayin'.
eMalum ago
Replying to OPs comment instead of glorifying brand new shill account. (This is what I was referring to: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1486184/7217967))
That's not how Occam's razor works. Logic only has a preference for simplicity because it's harder for us to test complex hypotheses. In many cases, the most popular theories have the least amount of assumptions because they can be falsifiably tested.
There's not a lot of assumption that has to be made for the image.
It's a picture of a guy with a boner, farting on the face of what appears to be a toddler with the caption: "True love". I would argue that the vast majority who saw this image would likely find it strange or upsetting, to say the least.
There are more assumptions when you hypothesize that the image represents a pictograph of body parts that when translated from Spanish to English, sorta resembles the word "Pedophile".
I'm not going to say you're wrong because I don't have to translate this thing from Spanish to see the context of the image, which is "Children give El Pedo a boner."
EDIT: @reasonedandinformed You better back it up. What the fuck is caution trolling? And can you show me where it applies to my post? I literally said the same shit as everyone else and agreed that this is some sick shit... but apparently I'm CTR? Okay. Whatever your paranoid mind comes up with, bud.
But seriously, what the fuck does that mean? I wanna know. Like, legit. Seems you know an awful lot about CTR and some of us are just casual observers, trying to piece all this shit together. But you wanna throw me under the bus for what reason? No wonder people on this sub call you a shill, dude... you're all over the place.
reasonedandinformed ago
Nice caution trolling, a classic CTR tactic.
PolybiusPizza ago
C'mon man! There isn't anything weird at all about drawing pictures of dudes with boners farting on babies...