Paste Bin: http://pastebin.com/vXY40mdM
Can you explain what this email means? (Note this is just ONE of many coded emails found in Wikileaks):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/55433
If not how would you try to?
Once you find out about this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handkerchief_code
And this:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cheese%20pizza
And then you talk to people who either are pedophiles or have been around those kind of people on the darknet or whatever and they are familiar with many more of these terms than someone who isn't involved in fucking children or into watching child porn. Normal people have no reason to be aware of any of these code words.
And then you start to look at all the shady connections Podesta the DNC and Clinton Foundation have you start to see the bigger picture...
Then you start to realize all of the similar events that occurred in the past that have been covered up and brushed away before the internet existed just like they are trying to do with Pizzagate and it becomes pretty obvious.:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/original_research_the_mountain_of_evidence_for_a/?ref=search_posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory_syndrome
Then you wonder why something like this even exists:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Memory_Syndrome_Foundation
If you can't understand how clues are used for an investigation then I have nothing left to say to you. Go read a book. Do some fucking research. READ.
No one who digs deep enough doubts the existence of an international human trafficking/child trafficking network that has been run by the elites of the world and protected by various government agencies all around the world for god knows how long. The evidence is there. You just are choosing not to look at it.
No one can post a few paragraphs on the internet that will convince you if your that determined to reject any thoughts that make you uncomfortable.
Most researchers started researching this hoping to be able to prove it false to give them a piece of mind and after WEEKS of reading and researching and sleepless nights they all ended up realizing there was no way there isn't an international human trafficking/child trafficking network that has been run by the elites of the world and protected by various government agencies all around the world.
view the rest of the comments →
ProbablyHoly ago
In the 1980s, a series of child sex abuse cases rocked the United States. The most famous case was the 1984 McMartin preschool case, but there were a number of others as well. By the latter part of the decade, the assumption was widespread that child sex abuse had become a serious problem in America. Yet within a few years, the concern about it died down considerably. The failure to convict anyone in the McMartin case and a widely publicized appellate decision in New Jersey that freed an accused molester had turned the dominant narrative on its head. In the early 1990s, a new narrative with remarkable staying power emerged: the child sex abuse cases were symptomatic of a 'moral panic' that had produced a witch hunt. A central claim in this new witch hunt narrative was that the children who testified were not reliable and easily swayed by prosecutorial suggestion. In time, the notion that child sex abuse was a product of sensationalized over-reporting and far less endemic than originally thought became the new common sense.
But did the new witch hunt narrative accurately represent reality? As Ross Cheit demonstrates in his exhaustive account of child sex abuse cases in the past two and a half decades, purveyors of the witch hunt narrative never did the hard work of examining court records in the many cases that reached the courts throughout the nation. Instead, they treated a couple of cases as representative and concluded that the issue was blown far out of proportion. Drawing on years of research into cases in a number of states, Cheit shows that the issue had not been blown out of proportion at all. In fact, child sex abuse convictions were regular occurrences, and the crime occurred far more frequently than conventional wisdom would have us believe. Cheit's aim is not to simply prove the narrative wrong, however. He also shows how a narrative based on empirically thin evidence became a theory with real social force, and how that theory stood at odds with a far more grim reality. The belief that the charge of child sex abuse was typically a hoax also left us unprepared to deal with the far greater scandal of child sex abuse in the Catholic Church, which, incidentally, has served to substantiate Cheit's thesis about the pervasiveness of the problem. In sum, The Witch-Hunt Narrative is a magisterial and empirically powerful account of the social dynamics that led to the denial of widespread human tragedy. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-witch-hunt-narrative-9780199931224?cc=gb&lang=en&#