The Voat platform is 1) compromised 2) inefficient 3) ineffective
I have an idea to make a social platform specifically for pizzagate. It will be very easy for me to do, since I already have built a social network site for a different purpose, but can repurpose the code for this investigation.
The fact is, we have no organization here with what needs to be researched. We have diamond posts and stellar leads that are being buried beneath all the crap that is being posted.
The platform that I can make for Pizzagate would enable us to have a greater reach to the general public (you'll see how once it's built) and allow us to be much more effective and efficient with our investigatory process.
Before I go full speed ahead to put the website together, I need to hear your opinions.
1) Would you be willing to use the platform if I can successfully deliver (and yes, I can successfully deliver. I just need to make sure all the bases are covered, which I am discussing now).
2) How many of you would have time and interest to help moderate the site?
3) There are two potential domain names I've considered. We can keep pizzagate in the domain (pizzagatejustice.com) or we can do something more general (citizeninvestigators.com) Cast your vote for the name style you think would be best for this.
4) I am willing to put my time and effort into building this (and quickly too) however there obviously will be costs to maintain and improve the servers and maintain the site. I can't afford to pay for all this stuff as the site would grow and require more server space. Are you all willing to pitch in to help cover the costs of running the site once it grows?
I basically am looking for your commitment before I dive in. I think this will be really great for our cause, but I can't do it alone. I can promise that I can build a very kickass platform for us to improve and supercharge the public investigatory process, as well make it SUPER simple for us to spread information from the investigation to the masses. But I need your support. Let me know. If you're with me, I am ready to start doing this right now.
view the rest of the comments →
micha_ ago
I agree, but then I look at what they DO, not what they say. Excluding Greenwald, but without Assange we would have never heard about the Podesta emails. In 10 years Wikileaks, it seems there was not a single non authentic info. Assange is living in a prison for years. They tried to smear him and destroy him. So this man to me has proven, that he is taking the most severe consquences for what he does. It's another question, if he is still alive, but if he is, I think asking Assange and getting his opinion, should be very helpful.