The Voat platform is 1) compromised 2) inefficient 3) ineffective
I have an idea to make a social platform specifically for pizzagate. It will be very easy for me to do, since I already have built a social network site for a different purpose, but can repurpose the code for this investigation.
The fact is, we have no organization here with what needs to be researched. We have diamond posts and stellar leads that are being buried beneath all the crap that is being posted.
The platform that I can make for Pizzagate would enable us to have a greater reach to the general public (you'll see how once it's built) and allow us to be much more effective and efficient with our investigatory process.
Before I go full speed ahead to put the website together, I need to hear your opinions.
1) Would you be willing to use the platform if I can successfully deliver (and yes, I can successfully deliver. I just need to make sure all the bases are covered, which I am discussing now).
2) How many of you would have time and interest to help moderate the site?
3) There are two potential domain names I've considered. We can keep pizzagate in the domain (pizzagatejustice.com) or we can do something more general (citizeninvestigators.com) Cast your vote for the name style you think would be best for this.
4) I am willing to put my time and effort into building this (and quickly too) however there obviously will be costs to maintain and improve the servers and maintain the site. I can't afford to pay for all this stuff as the site would grow and require more server space. Are you all willing to pitch in to help cover the costs of running the site once it grows?
I basically am looking for your commitment before I dive in. I think this will be really great for our cause, but I can't do it alone. I can promise that I can build a very kickass platform for us to improve and supercharge the public investigatory process, as well make it SUPER simple for us to spread information from the investigation to the masses. But I need your support. Let me know. If you're with me, I am ready to start doing this right now.
view the rest of the comments →
sleepingbeautycan ago
1) I will go if the majority goes. It is not the platform that is the key decider for me. I need a platform where the most people are so I can absorb as much content as I can and then go to twitter and put it out there.
I am finding voat pretty good. There is a lot of information getting lost I agree but there is so much information being found. It is not the platforms fault (imho) that there is too much to absorb and follow. Many people love the shitposts. Many people love hearing what celebrities say about it. Me, I'm here for the hard facts.
EpluribisPizzagate ago
The problem with voat is that the moderator is PRO TRUMP from /r/the-donald,
The second problem with voat is the down-voats silence anybody that isn't pro-trump.
I have used voat 4+ years, its pretty damn good.
Lastly, /v/pizzagate is DONE when it comes to investigation, the big boys have now taken over the huge people are now openly talking about pizza-gate, and they're taking our work from the past month and connecting the dot's.
I think v/pizzagate will continue to be a minor player, but this thing has now fragmented into 1,000's of little players and the best stuff is coming from outside of the USA.
Note the real victim of the USA's PEDO-GOV is children all over the world. The world hated the USA before, now they want to destroy it.
Pizzagate went from retards at 4chan, to alt-tards on reddit, to fools on voat, and now everybody on earth is looking at the evidence and writing and making videos.
Grab a beer, some popcorn and sit back with PUTIN and enjoy the show.
CJJacobs ago
No. The problem is that some of the mods are compromised.
sleepingbeautycan ago
In what way? The trump thing from above?
CJJacobs ago
No. Not the Trump thing. One or two of them are active saboteurs.
Which makes all of them suspect. I'm not the first to note. Phobos especially has been called out.
sleepingbeautycan ago
I just went through 25 delete logs for pizzagate and I didn't see anything alarming. Do you have an example?
CJJacobs ago
It's not necessarily what they are deleting. It is what they are upvoating.
The most recent example would be the story about Jimmy Savile, the BBC, and the NYT head guy, Mark Thompson. The voated it to the top for quite some time. There was nothing untrue in the article per se. The problem was is was an article purportedly from Russia. As in the Russia which we are all being accused by the mainstream media of being hackers for right now.
One mod in particular was alerted and claimed he saw nothing wrong with this source being there.
Even though an article from Russia being put out in support of pizzagate threatens the credibility of everything good that's being done and if it spreads or gets used on other social media platforms, it does A LOT of damage to the cause.
sleepingbeautycan ago
The article I saw at the top was one of the British mags. Are the mods upvoating stuff. I am not sure how it works other than pinning.
CJJacobs ago
It was top post for like two hours before. I think it has gone down a couple of notches, but still on front page.