...The article purports to be from 'Russia'.
The information in the article is true, okay, yes.
BUT if we start spreading that article, it being sourced from 'Russia'...if that spreads...we are literally playing right into the hands of the msm.
We are literally agreeing with the 'narrative' of the msm that our info is coming from Russia. WHY ISN'T THERE MORE PROTEST ABOUT THIS?
WHERE ARE THE MODS? WHERE ARE THE PLEBS?
Only responses I've been getting on this are from SHILLS trying to downvoat this into oblivion.
view the rest of the comments →
kekistocrat ago
Quite simply, I believe some of the mods are CTR Phobos, works with otisfirefly. All I can say is one has to keep track of their comments and figure out whether or not it goes to promote the msm narrative. It's time consuming and sucks that's why I stopped cause I wanted to do real research. I've noticed they use simple strategies, like down voting relevant stuff and using NVC & NLP to push the narrative. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1470365 my comments are clear but Phobos pushes the gunman... good luck
Phobos_Mothership ago
I say this a lot, but that post got SO many upvotes. Felt good to have the support of the community.
kekistocrat ago
Of course the community doesn't condone violence. I don't either. My contention is with your willingness to defend your position after a blatant oversight (or ?) was pointed out to you. Truth begins with knowing ones' self...
Phobos_Mothership ago
Defend what position?? The one that I don't condone violence? And it's a good thing for the community to openly state that fact?
kekistocrat ago
Oh for fuck's sake man... https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1470365/7135452 if you defend it, it makes you look bad. plain and simple. You defend an obvious error or intentional mistake. Either way.
Phobos_Mothership ago
what obvious error?
kekistocrat ago
Allright, fucker. I'm going to take your virtual hand here and walk you through this... I'm not wasting my time after this as I see this is but a job to you. You stated that I 'disliked a post about not being violent' -- That is not what I disliked. I stated quite clearly that I agree about no violence but disagree with acknowledgement of gunman. go read the reply. Your choice of words only adds credibility to my assertion that you're using NLP or NVC.' Obvious error. Your statement is false. You're defending an error or intentional mistake. It's like if you were in a courtroom and you did this, everyone would look away and chuckle at the absurdity of someone defending an obvious error, intentional or not.
Phobos_Mothership ago
We can't PROVE the gunman was a false flag, so I treat it like a POTENTIAL false flag. Is that wrong?
kekistocrat ago
A. False flag and staged event are two different things. B. Acknowledgement is giving credit to the msm's narrative, even if you can't prove it. Can you prove 'Pizzagate'. Doesn't make it any less important.