I know this might be obvious... but holy crap, they are moving them by BOAT (pizzagate)

submitted ago by dontkillmehillary

So, I'm doing research into some various leads and it all hits me at once.. They are moving the kids by boat!

Look at the major scandals and where they are located.... All of these locations are coastal and involved heavily in shipping trade;

  • Demmink Scandal - Netherlands
  • Norway ring
  • Jersey Isle
  • England/London
  • Kincorra scandal - Belfast
  • Florida (one of the highest abduction rates)
  • Epstein Island
  • Haiti
  • Hollywood
  • Hawaii
  • Australia - New South Wales

Draw lines from all of the places above and you can see that everywhere involved has easy access to shipping, which is traditionally easier to smuggle with than airlines. I know it's not a huge revelation, but it's pretty obvious they aren't moving these kids by private plane. Shipping logs need to be looked at.

We need to look at shipping companies used by the Clinton Foundation.

Here is David Paulides missing 411 map. Interesting to see the density close to port cities.

edit; added locations edit 2: added links and Missing 411 map.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

carmencita ago

The CIA Agent mentioned in these comments that started out as a child sex slave, was forced to bed with almost every President since Kennedy. Johnson, Bush Sr, Bush Jr, Reagan, Clinton, and Nelson Rockefeller. The holy roller Christian ones really kill me. She said Jimmy Carter was the only exception. The President of the US, has WH dinners and 5 to 50 women will be featured to be sold that night. The President can make $100M per year as his take from this very lucrative business run by the CIA. Yes, People, this is what is going on with our Politicians and our govt. It is thoroughly disgusting. The CIA (she says) bombs during the war and the children are taken to the orphanages the CIA runs. They take the best of the children and take them in a block to bring them to the US saying they will be adopted. What a shameful business. She also talks about sacrificing a child or young virgin as well at parties. So what we have read is what is really going on behind the curtain. Just like the curtain James Alefantis has at CPP.

Investigate1999 ago

I could almost imagine them deciding on where to bomb and attack; based solely on the number of children that they can "harvest".

carmencita ago

I guess they are looking at Russian kids since the President is threatening to reciprocate because of the "Russian hacking" fake news charges by CIA (who is behind the whole mess). They will get us all blasted to smithereens. Putin outlawed adoptions of Russian children by the US because he was on to what happened to the adopted children. This is so very shameful and disgusting. Our leaders and politicians are constantly berating Putin and Russia but yet they are guilty of some of the most heinous acts against the world's most vulnerable.

Investigate1999 ago

That's interesting.

This reminds me of what FBIAnon said. He said that Russia is really good, when it comes to freedom. If this is true, then what you said must be true. After all, a normal good leader would ban adoptions by a corrupt country. He would want to protect orphans, even if it meant suffering by more orphans.

This is so disturbing, isn't it?

carmencita ago

That is why I believe it has been so hard to convince certain people. We have all been brainwashed about our own country. Who would not want to believe that we are the white hats and everyone else wears black hats. Those of us that have been red pilled will have to help those that just are not strong enough to accept this awful truth. No matter what color the pill, it will still be hard to swallow.

Investigate1999 ago

I agree. It's really hard.

I remember a long time ago, when Saddam was still part of the news. I brought up the idea: "What if Saddam was a good guy, and what if we have been deceived?". Nobody even entertained the discussion. I don't think that he was a good guy, but I think that we haven't really considered his perspective well enough.

Another thing that surprised me is that FBIAnon said that the holocaust never happened. He said that there were lots of deaths, but it never happened, and the census records support it. I watched a few YouTube videos, and they went through the numbers and the science of cremation. I honestly don't know how legitimate it is.

The best support for the holocaust was from a reddit user, who said that there were quite a few speeches given by prominent Nazi leaders before the mainstream discovery of the holocaust.

Another thing that FBIAnon said was that Mossad was behind 9/11.

When I take all the views out there and then put them together, the most cohesive view that I can get is that 9/11 was a Saudi effort to send the USA into the other regions of the Middle East, so that Saudi Arabia could assert dominance in the region. It had hoped to pin the blame on Iraq and Afghanistan. Mossad got wind of this, and then posed as a terrorist cell network, and acted as 1 of the 2 terrorist organizations to train the attackers of 9/11. Mossad had hoped to push the USA into the Middle East to dominate the region, while releasing evidence that it was a Saudi conspiracy. So, both Saudi Arabia and Israel pushed in the same direction, even though they are mortal enemies.

Human trafficking is tangential to this, but it heavily influences the event, in that the Saudis and the Clinton Foundation trade services for human slaves and prostitutes.

Somebody in this forum shared with me snippets of text from the Talmud. I can say that those snippets are very racist on first glance. I could imagine that a lot of people believe that kind of thing. FBIAnon said that the Zionists [including George Soros] are like a Jewish version of the Nazis. If this is true, then it might explain why Hitler focused on the Jews so much. He must have hated the way that Jews treated Germans. I'm not saying that Hitler is a hero in this scenario. I'm just saying that he doesn't operate in a vacuum, and that we are all victimized to a certain degree.

So, if any of what I found out is true, then here are the groups and their details in broad terms.

  • Zionist: Nazi-like; strong hate for Saudi Arabia & other Middle Eastern countries; tolerates USA; might enjoy pedophilia and human trafficking

  • Saudi Arabia's Royal Family: looks down on USA; enjoys pedophilia, human trafficking

  • Clinton Foundation & Washington DC: looks down on everybody, but uses everybody; enjoys pedophilia, human trafficking, and Satanism

There are other countries, too, but these are the strongest trends, I think.

I'm not going to defend this view, though, because I honestly don't know.

carmencita ago

A lot of what you say makes sense. I think Obama is one of the worst Presidents ever. They have all had their bad moments, aside from LBJ, who ran that heinous war with Vietnam. I have a crazy idea, and it may not make sense to others or be true, but I somewhat doubt that we killed Bin Laden. I cannot even believe for a second that we would harm the head of a Saudi. They would not have been in favor of us taking him down. I believe he is living somewhere maybe in hiding, maybe with a new face. It would be one of the greatest lies Obama has told. They would all have lied. Everyone that was in that Situation Room. But then we know that everyone in there is good at telling lies and is compromised. Obama, Biden, Hillary, etc. Just a crazy idea.

Investigate1999 ago

It sounds like a pretty legitimate idea to me, when you tie it into the idea of Saudi Arabia not permitting it. I don't know much about them, so I could picture them looking out for their own.

Part of my idea from the previous post comes from my views on God and his sovereignty. In general, I've come to learn that he doesn't want us to create a certain outcome. He just wants us to do specific things at specific times, and then he will bring about the correct outcome. To understand what I'm saying, you have to imagine a Star Trek world full of different time lines, where he chooses which time line will exist. There are infinite possibilities, and sometimes he, in his goodness will choose the ugliest time line.

We, on the other hand, will panic, when we see the possible dark outcome. That is why I quickly jumped on the Mossad-Saudi theory for 9/11. Mossad would have to panic, when they see Saudi Arabia gaining dominance in the Middle East. After all, Saudi Arabia has been funding terrorism, haven't they? Mossad and the Zionists would want to destabilize the Middle East, so that they could justify controlling it. To do that, they send in the US.

The funny thing is that they could have just backed off, and let history run its course, but they also wanted to control the presentation of the evidence, so that the Saudis would look guilty. They wanted to tar everybody.

Of course, this is just a theory. shrug

carmencita ago

It certainly sounds plausible. We know not what they have in store. My advice for this whole mess and what we can do right now (aside from what many of us are already trying to do on here) is to take down the jobs of the present Dems that are in office. We need to threaten them with loss of jobs. I think in the up coming mid terms there will be a huge back lash. They certainly deserve it.