i have seen that argument. and i am always open to the truth, wherever it leads. i am sure it is him, though, as are other survivors ...his own family would have spoken up by now, if he really has one. as would any family members of the children in the photos on alefantis's page. who would stand by, while speculation like that was alive? they would disprove it, if they could.
It's certainly bizarre. I was reading more on that David Schurter's blog about Scalia. After everything we've read historically speaking, about the prior investigations and witness statements, his theory sure is interesting.
view the rest of the comments →
Freemasonsrus ago
Argument against Gannon being Johnny by a survivor. http://davidshurter.com/?p=2807
Bo was way over the top in the interview you linked. Also, from what I've read there was never a DNA test?
YouaremeandIamyou ago
i have seen that argument. and i am always open to the truth, wherever it leads. i am sure it is him, though, as are other survivors ...his own family would have spoken up by now, if he really has one. as would any family members of the children in the photos on alefantis's page. who would stand by, while speculation like that was alive? they would disprove it, if they could.
Freemasonsrus ago
It's certainly bizarre. I was reading more on that David Schurter's blog about Scalia. After everything we've read historically speaking, about the prior investigations and witness statements, his theory sure is interesting.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
i have to agree. he does make some excellent points. all these points will add up to a full picture, if we keep sifting through them.