i have seen that argument. and i am always open to the truth, wherever it leads. i am sure it is him, though, as are other survivors ...his own family would have spoken up by now, if he really has one. as would any family members of the children in the photos on alefantis's page. who would stand by, while speculation like that was alive? they would disprove it, if they could.
It's certainly bizarre. I was reading more on that David Schurter's blog about Scalia. After everything we've read historically speaking, about the prior investigations and witness statements, his theory sure is interesting.
I think, whatever the case, she could have some valid reasons for not pressing the truth of this matter, and Jeff could, for not admitting who he is. There needs to be a universal agreement of some kind, that makes the truth welcome, and makes people that come forward, feel confident. Until there is, the root of this problem, appears to be, that the law prosecutes victims and protects offenders, when it comes to this most serious of crimes. It is something nearly 99 percent of us, feel wholeheartedly about, yet they have managed to make us feel helpless about it, so far. I think it is a big wake up call. Until children, are safe beyond a doubt, then no one is really living. To think they are, is fooling themsleves. We are living in minoutaur maze, and we need to find the way out..
view the rest of the comments →
Freemasonsrus ago
Argument against Gannon being Johnny by a survivor. http://davidshurter.com/?p=2807
Bo was way over the top in the interview you linked. Also, from what I've read there was never a DNA test?
YouaremeandIamyou ago
i have seen that argument. and i am always open to the truth, wherever it leads. i am sure it is him, though, as are other survivors ...his own family would have spoken up by now, if he really has one. as would any family members of the children in the photos on alefantis's page. who would stand by, while speculation like that was alive? they would disprove it, if they could.
Freemasonsrus ago
It's certainly bizarre. I was reading more on that David Schurter's blog about Scalia. After everything we've read historically speaking, about the prior investigations and witness statements, his theory sure is interesting.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
I think, whatever the case, she could have some valid reasons for not pressing the truth of this matter, and Jeff could, for not admitting who he is. There needs to be a universal agreement of some kind, that makes the truth welcome, and makes people that come forward, feel confident. Until there is, the root of this problem, appears to be, that the law prosecutes victims and protects offenders, when it comes to this most serious of crimes. It is something nearly 99 percent of us, feel wholeheartedly about, yet they have managed to make us feel helpless about it, so far. I think it is a big wake up call. Until children, are safe beyond a doubt, then no one is really living. To think they are, is fooling themsleves. We are living in minoutaur maze, and we need to find the way out..
YouaremeandIamyou ago
i have to agree. he does make some excellent points. all these points will add up to a full picture, if we keep sifting through them.