Please be cautious of anything involving Gunderson.
He has a long history of controversy
ETA: Here's the link I originally posted but it is not the right link. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/23/the-strange-case-of-ted-gunderson/ A poster below got all freaked out because I deleted it. Now he's spinning because mindless paranoia is easier than critical thinking, but he'll wear himself out eventually. But the link I am looking for is an article written by a mother of one of the McMartin day care victims Jackie McGauley who shares her account of interactions w/ Gunderson. Please post if you have it.
Listen fuckwit... you are a weak link and a distraction with all this shit. I suspect you're actually not and are mostly a contributing participant in the cause, here, but you sure the hell aren't acting like it with this shit. If you cannot handle critical thought then this is not the place for you.
You don't call a person a shill simply because you don't agree with them--or in this case--you don't understand them. For future reference, you do not cry "shill" unless you suspect someone of actually trying to sabotage information or are trying to prevent information from being shared. Make a decent fucking effort to look into history, patterns of previous posts before you start crying 'shill'. You're being lazy and creating a lot of noise. It's not appreciated.
Definitions:
"A shill is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization."
"The shill attempts to spread buzz by personally endorsing the product in public forums with the pretense of sincerity, when in fact he is being paid for his services"
"A person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty."
Your inexplicable defense of Gunderson is more shill-like than any word of caution I've posted. Now fuck off.
view the rest of the comments →
hedy ago
Please be cautious of anything involving Gunderson.
He has a long history of controversy
ETA: Here's the link I originally posted but it is not the right link. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/23/the-strange-case-of-ted-gunderson/ A poster below got all freaked out because I deleted it. Now he's spinning because mindless paranoia is easier than critical thinking, but he'll wear himself out eventually. But the link I am looking for is an article written by a mother of one of the McMartin day care victims Jackie McGauley who shares her account of interactions w/ Gunderson. Please post if you have it.
disclosuretimes ago
Thanks for the heads up. As far as I know, his research is mostly from sources independent of him.
dindonufin ago
Nah this is bullshit. There is no "controversy". This guy is trying too hard to discredit Gunderson.
This is the article he cited, then so sneakily deleted after I called him out (read it, all of it): http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/23/the-strange-case-of-ted-gunderson/
hedy ago
You're an idiot.
dindonufin ago
Good one, shill.
hedy ago
Listen fuckwit... you are a weak link and a distraction with all this shit. I suspect you're actually not and are mostly a contributing participant in the cause, here, but you sure the hell aren't acting like it with this shit. If you cannot handle critical thought then this is not the place for you.
You don't call a person a shill simply because you don't agree with them--or in this case--you don't understand them. For future reference, you do not cry "shill" unless you suspect someone of actually trying to sabotage information or are trying to prevent information from being shared. Make a decent fucking effort to look into history, patterns of previous posts before you start crying 'shill'. You're being lazy and creating a lot of noise. It's not appreciated.
Definitions:
"A shill is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization."
"The shill attempts to spread buzz by personally endorsing the product in public forums with the pretense of sincerity, when in fact he is being paid for his services"
"A person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty."
Your inexplicable defense of Gunderson is more shill-like than any word of caution I've posted. Now fuck off.
dindonufin ago
Are you done yet? Fuckin RETARD.