The New York Time just made a giant blunder. They removed an article they published on 20 Nov that broke the story of a pedophile network being investigated in Norway. They also managed to have all references removed from archive.org. Unfortunately for them, someone had already archived it on archive.is. We now have a side-by-side glaring piece of evidence that the New York Time has actually removed the article, and with the ongoing censorship around #pizzagate, this is hardly a coincidence.
Here is the link to archive.is .
It shows the two versions of the document with date. Spread the link far and wide. Use it to show people that censorship around pizzagate is real. We are not talking about an unknown alternative news website. We are not talking about alleged Russian propaganda or conspiracy theorists having hallucinations and writing outrageous slander that needs to be removed. We are talking about the New York Time making an article about the investigation of a pedophile ring, keeping it online two weeks, and then removing it, probably following external pressures.
This doesn't prove that #pizzagate is real. But that proves that the elite and MSM are afraid of #pizzagate, so afraid that they are trying to eliminate every traces of elite-related pedophilia scandals, even at the risk of being accused of violating the first amendment. Which strongly suggests that what they are trying to hide is much worse than that, and that they would probably consider themselves content if all that they got charged with was the violation of the first amendment. And that thing they are trying to hide is ... that #pizzagate is real. That's the only logical conclusion, and I expect that this time around, people have seen enough censorship going on and will make the leap forward.
view the rest of the comments →
standalone ago
The NYT has a paper edition, a digital tablet edition, an online subscriber and free edition, a search service for online subscribers to look up past articles (and where they rightfully expect to find all past articles) and their content is archived in many national and academic newspapers databases. This publication model is not at all compatible with time-limited content. Obviously they can't remove content from the paper edition and the tablet edition (it's a downloaded document) and that would make things really confusing if they pulled things they have published from archives and databases which purpose is to retain the history of published articles. This would also break the references of all the websites and other articles who use the NYT as a blueprint for fact checking. Not to mention search engines (a big part of their incoming traffiic) that would get dead links. Wikipedia is a prominent example of such website that is chokefull stuffed with references to the NYT and other mainstream newspaper.
I've never seen that happening, and I have been landing on NYT articles from search engine queries and Wikipedia very often. What are the chances that the first instance of that I ever see would be about an article with strong connection to #pizzagate during the most intense wave of censorship the web has ever known.
I'm very skeptical of your hypothesis. Can you point us to the section of AP licensing terms where they describe this limited time license? And show a handful of other non-pizzagate and non-election related articles of the NYT where this happened so that we can confirm this isn't an isolated case and not caused by a political bias?