You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

momadona ago

I have been saying this all along. Without examples of this code in use, it's all up to the reader to interpret it at will. The code is the cornerstone of this investigation. If the cornerstone won't hold up under intense scrutiny, it serves no purpose to us.

amCassandraAMA ago

it isnt anymore, no. This was the initial hint that started it, but we found enough already that totally qualifies as circumstantial evidence.

I'm totally okay with people not believing that this is codespeech, but that doesn't make the Podestas Artcollection go away. Neither will the amount of convicted sex offenders, or the public behaviour or Alefantis, or the connection to convicted child traffickers that now work in the government.

It also doesnt explain the spooky behaviour of totally different news sites reacting like one person.

thezodiac ago

I think we should post ALL the controversial emails and try to debunk one by one. If they stand heavy scrutiny, then it's probably code. The problem is: in most emails that are being talked about, some of them I don't think have code at all.