THIS POST IS TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS brought up in post

It was literally two users, (TWO USERS WHO I THINK HAD NO ILL WILL INTENDED) who brought Up concerns, Even thoughs others refuted them... But they remain the top comments in the thread, so it would be irresponsible to not address them.**

First and Foremost. THe source in question, was used to post DOZENS of different filings for hand full of companies Including but not limited too

NEW INFORMATION FOR DAVIDFLINTSTONE AND MR STONE INC.Title Here

DAVID FLINTSTONE ISLAND DISTILLERS here

• Various Companies FOr David Franjoine (I WILL GIVE EXAMPLES OF SAME COMPANY, WITH REVOKED, AND ACTIVE FILINGS)

• And Clinton foundation ( I WILL ALSO GIVE EXAMPLES OF SAME COMPANY WITH REVOKED AND ACTIVE FILINGS)

Out of the Dozens OF filings I link in my original Post j AND T PACKING COMPANY is the only one that can not Be verified at this time... NOT BECAUSE IT's FAKE. But because there is illegitimately no paper trail. The source used to insinuate that it is fake, HAS NO BEARING ON THE SOURCE I PROVIDED. IT IS TWO SEPERATE FILINGS, WHICH WE WILL GO OVER NOW.

The concerns of the two users were as followed.

" WE'RE BEING PLAYED !!! *

"Google 'Bizapedia and AgileCraft' to see what I mean. AgileCraft is a software company whose VP is LJ ALEFANTIS. I believe that they are planting false information. If we do not check our sources we will be discredited as well as waste lots of time. (Note the street address of this so called packing company.) AND ARCHIVE EVERYTHING"

This could end up being true, BUT THE REASONS TO SAY THIS, ARE NONSENSICAL, which I will address after I address the comment reply, To the above comment.

Another User Replied: "I'll be damned, you are right! This Bizapedia entry (archive) about the J & T Packing is inconsistent with the Arkansas registry. Here is the official record (archive):"

The first link provided in the above comment goes to this

The second Link Goes to this

• I was well aware of the second lInk, as I found it at the same time as the first... I DID NOT include it in my post, because I could not for see it being misconstrued or used as a reason to discredit the first link. I SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED IT ORIGINALLY, AND EXPLAINED THE SITUATION THEN.

In a message exchange I have with this user, He goes on to say ." A company can't be both live and defunct, and both a for-profit and non-profit company etc, so one of the registries has to be fake and contain "planted" information. "

First thing to address here is that is simply UNTRUE to say that one or the other Has to be planted. In fact, It makes zero sense. ALL THAT MEANS, Is that there were two seperate Filings... The filing It self, IS NOT Indicative of the status of the ENTIRE COMPANY! IT is only addressing A SPECIFIC FILING, IN A SPECIFIC STATE, WITH SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES.

We are going to prove this point with the Clinton foundation.

• HERE is a specific Filling for the CLINTON FOUNDATION, IN ARKANSAS that is DISSOLVED. here

• HERE IS a different Filing for clinto foundation, IN ARKANSAS that is ACTIVE

LETS LOOK AT A DIFFERENT EXAMPLE WITH PEOPLE INVOLVED FROM MY OTHER POST.

• HERE IS A FILING FOR MAINLINE CONTRACTING(DAVID FRANJOINE) INVOLUNTARILY REVOKED.Title Here

BASED ON WHAT THE USER CLAIMS, The above filing means that MAINLINE CONTRACTING, CAN NOT BE ACTIVE. This is a dangerous misinterpretation of the facts.

• Here is a filing for mainline contracting that is active, Title Here

[ Based On what the user used as a foundation to discredit my information, We should assume that two of the above mentioned Filings, Are fabricated, or false. To assume that would be nonsensical.

They are not. They are four facts, with completely different circumstances and standings.

The link the user provided, Was to a DIFFERENT FIling of J & T packing company inc. With different circumstances surrounding it. By now means Does one or the other FABRICATED. ALL IT MEANS, IS THAT SPECIFIC FILING, WAS REVOKED. IT doesn't even provide A date as to when that was..

HE States that this link is the OFFICAL RECORD of J an T packing company... IT IS NOT IT IS ONLY AN OFFICAL RECORD OF THIS SPECIFIC FILING !

In fact on that same page it says," LLC Member information is now confidential per Act 865 of 2007". If I'm interpreting that correctly, Even if they had a different Filing, we wouldn;t know who is on it. The Filing in question on that page. Was most likely REVOKED, A WHILE AGO. BUT EITHER WAY! WE WOULD NOT SEE WHO ELSE IS LISTED!

To address the concerns of bizapedias Accuracy.

This is the website the user linked to here

• That is an OPEN FORUM, that anyone can anonymously contribute too. Based on what the user is insinuating... He is saying that the open forum, Should be taken more seriously, than the source I provided.... The source that IS NOT OPEN, and CAN NOT BE EASILY manipulated here.

WHO DO YOU THINK IS COMPLAINING ABOUT THE IN ACCURACY OF BIZAPEDIA? WHO IS IT SAYING THAT THEIR REPUTATION IS BEING HURT!?

ASK YOURSELF! IS ANYONE ELSE TRYING TO DISCREDIT THE VALIDITY OF CERTAIN INFORMATION, BASED ON NOTHING BUT RANDOM PEOPLE AND THEIR UNFOUNDED OPINIONS.... DOES THIS SOUND LIKE ANYTHING ELSE WE"VE BEEN DEALING WITH!? ARE WE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THIS IS A NEW TACTIC?

Based On what the user is insinuating, HE'S SAYING THAT THE FILING I PROVIDED, WAS FABRICATED AS A RED HERRING, TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RELEVANT INFORMATION

Ok, Then what does that have to do with the link reviewing the site it self?

• He' claiming that we shouldn't pay attention to the Filing, Because it was planted their by CTR...
• But then he's also saying that The information may just be wrong....

This is an insane fucking notion and it scares me that it made it to the top of the thread.

I never Once claimed there doesn't need to be questions answered about the information I found.... BUt the only people saying that it is straight Up useless... Say that because of their lack of understanding around business filings, Which leads them to believe that one of the sources HAS TO BE fabricated...

And his other reason is that The source has Bad reviews according to this open forum website...

Both of his reasoning CONTRADICT the other.

In my other post, I link to DOZENS of Buisness filings, Only involving a handful of companies, SOME ARE OLD, SOME ARE REVOKED. SOME ARE RECENT, AND GOOD STANDING, SOME HAVE BEEN DISSOLVED. A SINGLE BUSINESS FILING IS NOT INDICATIVE OF THE STATUS OF COMPANY AS A WHOLE.

GO TO https://www.bizapedia.com/ny/william-j-clinton-foundation.html Click companies In the right hand corner, Search PLease Do not dimiss information, because of a single person in the comments, Who can not give a valid reason to substantiate their claims.

I hope this answers any concerns.

There most certainly needs to be verification of these facts. BUT YOU MUST PROVIDE A REASON THEY ARE EITHER FABRICATED OR WRONG. THE TOP VOTED COMMENT, DID NOT FUCKING DO THAT.