I hear that almost every time I bring up any of these hoaxes that had Muslim culprits and it is a fair objection. I used to think the same thing, even after I figured out Sandy Hook was a completely fake event where no one actually died I couldn't believe they would do the same thing with Muslims because it contradicts their pro-Islam, pro-immigration, pro-refugee, pro-multiculturalism narrative. However when I saw how obviously fabricated and staged the Boston Marathon Bombing was, I had no choice but to rethink this presupposition.

Here's how I explain it: yes it goes against their Muslim narrative, but if you've read 1984 you are familiar with the concept of doublethink, whereby you are expected to hold two conflicting ideas in your head at the same time. In this case, you must think that Muslims are our friends/Islam is a religion of peace, and also that there are scary ISIS agents who could kill you at any moment. This makes people confused, scared, and more amenable to the police state.

It also justifies Obama's increased military action in the middle east - remember that when the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s America needed a new "bad guy" to blame everything on and it became radical Islamic terror.

Also, no matter who does the shooting it still serves as a pretext for increased gun control and surveillance.

Finally, and in my opinion most importantly, if every fake shooting were an Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, Dylann Roof, or James Holmes, aka a freaky psycho white kid, no one would believe it. Most people don't bother questioning the authenticity of any event where a Muslim is blamed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yrzMhg6yYM

The Pulse discussion starts at about 21 minutes in, before that he talks about Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon, and there is a ton of great stuff on Youtube if you want to look around or I can give you more material.