Will post updated infographic if I see one. But most of them are getting more complicated as the investigation continues. And complicated mindmaps are not something you'd wanna' scare a newcomer with. But below are a list of links/strategies to get someone convinced it's even a possibility. So no illuminati theories or talk of MK Ultra. (But FWIW, based on everything uncovered from pizzagate, I have now opened my mind to the possibility of other conspiracy theories I had previously dismissed/scoffed at. Just...pick your battles, okay?)
Now, let's address the common misconceptions that allow normies to dismiss this all. (e.g. Wikileaks is Russian propaganda. Even Sam Harris' newest podcast blames Russia and dismisses pizzagate as "fakenews.")
*OMG You belive Fake News?
So, if I had to pick just one, I'd pick this article because it explains the origin of "fake news" with a fairly objective approach. And that seems to be the very first line of defense. Plus, the article hooks the reader with hyperlinks to other articles that actually address the arguments we pizzagaters put forth, instead of just calling it "debunked" from the get go.
Only problem is it's written by Russia Today's Germany branch. The translation is great for 95% of it aside from awkward syntax. But just like the Julian Assange interview with RT raised some eyebrows, so will this. Russia is the boogie man for many...
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https://deutsch.rt.com/gesellschaft/43601-fake-news-was-hinter-steilen-pizzagate/
*It's All Just Confirmation Bias
If they claim this is all just "confirmation bias" as the Dilbert guy has, and the Mad TV guy on Joe Rogan's podcast did, then I'd suggest linking to this. In short, it's the Mcmann kidnapping "dry snitch" theory. It's full of cited sources that prove the computer police sketches are legit. And no1 can deny the pics are almost identical to the Podestas (even though both pics are supposed to be of the same man.) It doesn't prove anything, but can help others to understand why people take this stuff serious.
http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
*Scapegoat Russia?
Here's, (the infamously leftwing fact checking site), Politifact's objective take on all the accusations of Russia's influence on hacks. TL;DR: No evidence, just speculation.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/dec/01/russia-and-its-influence-presidential-election/
But those 17 intelligence agencies Hillary talked about in the debate??? Nope:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-20/fact-17-intelligence-agencies-confirmed-russia-behind-email-hacks-isn%E2%80%99t-actually%E2%80%A6a-f
*No1 That Famous/Important Could Keep It Secret
If they say it's unlikely 'cuz of the high profile ppl being accused, just tell them to google "Jimmy Savile" & "Laura Silsby."
And/or give them this list of high ranking gov't workers caught trafficking/raping kids:
https://medium.com/@LoriHandrahan2/daniel-rosen-s-arrest-1f7befb1762c#.pomklase8
*Socratic Method
And if you fancy the Socratic method of red pilling, then here are some questions to ask them posted by @templarknight here:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1459638
derram ago
https://archive.is/CNEhE :
This has been an automated message.