You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

micha_ ago

I have a few questions:

THE REDDIT USER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS HER CONCERNS ABOUT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND HER BOSS’S ACTIVITY AS CHEESYBAY.

HER? You know she is female? Can you point to the reddit-text indicating that?

You are writing about "Richard Windsor" and then suddenly jump to "Dave Stone". How is this "Dave Stone" connected to "Richard Windsor" or the Clinton Foundation?

And the mentioning of another "Dave Stone", only because it's a name that can be associated with Goldman Sachs, but admitting that he is dead? What is that good for or do I understand you wrong?

The "raving reviews of used HDs" from cheesybay are well known. But I have read some the user ratings and

a) Cheesybay was selling lots of other hardware, not only HDs

b) I could not find any suspicious reviews of sold HDs. Only very typical ebay buyer feedback.

But can you show us the suspicious feedback that indicates that the HDs were filled with CP?

Edit 1: The name I see is "Bif Skipman", not "Biff Skippman". And he also calls it cheesebay, not cheesybay.

TheGrimReader ago

Allow mw to explain: Sasha/Anita Lord emails Dave Stone about getting a reference for Richard Windsor.

Dave Stone is not directly connected to goldman Sachs.

BP BISHOP TRUST owns 5% of Goldman Sachs as well as the property is question.

Dave Stone is mentioned multiple times in HRC's leaked emails, one is an officer who died. But the fact that she has a private meeting with a "Dave Stone" after the death of the service man implies there is more than one. In fact the emails indicated a third dave stone.

In the emails of HRC he is attached to an LLC dealing with human trafficking but according to research they only own a few pieces of real estate in DC.

Does that help?

micha_ ago

You mean in the Podesta emails? Why isn't that important info mentioned or explained?

Where are the references to these emails so that they can be checked?

Why are pics with a resolution so low used, that the letters can't be read?

No overview, no summary of facts, no conclusions. Just a collection of data and claiming it was relevant somehow, but HOW relevant it is, others may check, please...

pall_mall ago

Yea this shit'll make you dizzy and I'm not convinced it isn't intentionally that way. Always seems like a nugget of something odd and then it floods you with information to hide the fact that the actual connections are really thin. i try and follow it as best i can so i only recognize bits and pieces but im fairly positive that the whole 'hotdog stand?!?' part doesn't connect to the podesta but his brother and refers to a joke that amounts to retiring on the beach that was in some article.

there has been some odd shit but i dont know that anything here is terribly coherent or passes the threshold of just stretching shit to the point that it sorta kinda almost fits?

micha_ ago

Ofcourse that's intentional. If you want others to collaborate on a difficult topic, you have researched, will you give an overview, explanations and conclusions, so that you can receive help ASAP, or will you write unstructured posts, with missing and unreadable data, but purely based on sensationalism?

Pay attention, how my simple, but crucial questions will be answered. ;-)

pall_mall ago

The problem is when the information overload distracts from the purpose. The connections are what are important. You can have two huge puzzles built but if the only piece connecting them looks like it was mashed in there and doesn't fit then the entire exercise is ridiculous.

I see a lot of information about a lot of different things. Some do look shady but shady isn't a connection to anything. There are an infinite amount shady things. I mean from tax evasion, to building codes to fucking pedos. My problem isn't with the information.

My problem is that the connections to the larger picture are fucking shaky at best.

micha_ ago

It can't even be called information overload. It's more like BS-overload. The good and important facts are buried by sensationalist garbage. This thread is one example. Another one is the sticky 240MM money laundering thread. ZERO factual connection to CPP. or the Clinton Foundation. The same in this thread: all important conclusions are made out of thin air.

In the meanwhile I even have doubts, if the majority even can follow these confusing posts logically. They seem to react only because they are triggered by single words or sentences. But if the next sentence has absolutely no causal relationship seems to be already outside the scope of understanding.

pall_mall ago

Yea man I'm with ya, doing my best to keep an open mind but it seems most motherfuckers are just letting theirs fall out