Someone was mentioning that Madeiline McCann's eye defect is extremely rare, like only 1% or 2% of children ever have it. It involves some kind of extraordinarily unique genetic feature, possibly related to blood composition. Apparently Madeiline McCann was also conceived in vitro -- not sure why.
Now here's what happened. Someone claiming to be with the FBI said that George Soros is at the heart of this. I don't know whether the person really was with the FBI, but the things he or she said have been highly accurate.
Another poster here just made a comment based on only a gut instinct. Here is what the person said:
So I'm thinking, with the stuff about the blood bank and the hypothesis about young peoples blood perserving life...what if she [Madeiline McCann] was connected to that important, rich and powerful person via in vitro conception, and we know that important person is connected to people in the DNC, who would do some dirty work (kidnapping). She would have genetically the same blood/stem cells or something and her blood could be harvested (ongoing) for blood transfusions.
Now that sounds so crazy that most would dismiss it out of hand. But just for the hell of it, I searched for images of George Soros.
SURE ENOUGH! He has the very same genetic anomaly as Madeiline McCann. http://i.sli.mg/pOlFLf
Did he make an arrangement to have her taken so he could harvest her blood?
You know what, this is just getting too crazy. I'm going to just say that this is a huge coincidence, because my mind can't fathom this stuff about the blood... but make of it what you will.
George Soros eye: http://i.sli.mg/pOlFLf
Madeiline McCann eye: http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44441000/jpg/_44441917_maddy.203.jpg
view the rest of the comments →
LolturdFerguson ago
Well, David Icke said they were all reptile aliens for years. And we laughed and laughed. I mean, I still laugh....but what if....
I read in some of my occult books that the 'serpent' has to use the blood of a tortured victim to regenerate. I am assuming I am grasping at metaphysical straws here though.
micha_ ago
I stilll laugh. But at you, if you can't differntiate between a FACT and a CLAIM. Fact is the anomaly is Madeleine's eye. Also in Soros' eye. That are the facts. The rest you wrote, is fact free. So it is something you believe in. So you are in a religious sphere. We are here to investigate and collect intersting facts. So you are harming Pizzagate, with your inability to separate your personal wishful thinking, your believe, from FACTS.
LolturdFerguson ago
I never said I believed anything...I just merely stated what I read in some old books in a comment thread discussion. I did not post an article or a link that said.."HEY GUYS! I'M ONTO SOMETHING HERE!". No, I merely stated an opinion, which is objectionable as well as steeped in my own perception of the matter at hand.
Throwing out a 'what if' isn't harmful to anything. It means you can break from the constraints of linear thinking for a moment.
Also, don't go around assuming that everything you perceive to 'know' is actually real. Science was just undiscovered magic thousands of years ago...we have no idea what our government is keeping from us in regards to technology and advancement.
micha_ ago
Aha, so because science makes mistakes all the time, we should throw out evidences and facts. What kind of weird "logic"!
LolturdFerguson ago
What? NO! I'm literally just saying entertain all thoughts without accepting them. Aristotle paraphrase there.
We cannot dismiss something because we deem it too 'fanciful' to be real...until of course it's proven otherwise, right?
micha_ ago
How it's proven? By FACTS, not ideas or thoughts.