Let me introduce you to a technique called parallel construction:
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate— "evidentiary" basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how the investigation actually began.
An example of parallel construction would be if your cell phone is unlawfully tapped to track your activity and whereabouts at a time, t, during which you committed a crime. Because this is an unlawful means by which to link you to the crime you committed at t, it would not be admissible in a criminal court proceeding. Thus, a separate (lawful, and thereby admissible) chain of evidence would be developed to show the court that at t you committed the crime. Both evidentiary paths lead to the same conclusion, but only one be used to show that you committed the crime.
On the basis strong inductive evidence, it is virtually certain that the Podesta brothers are involved in child abduction, and that the eFits are an example of parallel construction. There are three obviously shady features of the official "eFit story" worth keeping in mind:
- The eFits were supressed for five years.
- The witness testimony they were based on is dubious.
- The private investigation company that helped produce the eFits is being hunted by the Clinton-appointed DOJ.
What likely occurred is this: John and Tony were being monitored unlawfully, possibly by the NSA, or some other intelligence actor. Whoever found out what they did, wanted to leak the truth to the world, but could not reveal the means by which they found out. Thus they created the eFits as parallel evidence. That is why we now have the eFits.
It is a leak. And someone on the inside wants to help bring down this organized human trafficking syndicate. The Podestas might be key players in the syndicate. Outing them would create a domino effect.
It is a multi-billion dollar human trafficking red market operated by international regimes and cartels. Pedophilia, organ harvesting, blood storage, forced prostitution, psychiatric and pharmacological experimentation, sextortion blackmail, human donations, and yes sadistic torture for fun -- you name it -- that's what these children are put through.
It needs to be brought down efficiently while preserving continuity of government, otherwise there would be a national security crisis and multiple declarations of war.
What is our role in this? To spread the information as widely as possible. We are conditioning the public for the forthcoming crash landing. It will be talked about for the next 100 years or more.
Yes, all of the available evidence indicates quite strongly that the Podesta brothers are involved. Examine it for yourself: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
view the rest of the comments →
SIMONBARROW ago
My view from the beginning was that the efits were such a perfect match for the Podesta brothers that they looked as if they had been drawn from photographs not witness recollection. I'm baffled as to the motive, however, particularly when everything would suggest that John Podesta, at least, enjoys getting his hands dirty (i.e., he doesn't seem to leave the nasty stuff to others), and therefore may actually have been involved in Portugal. And there is the additional fact that John Podesta appears in a photograph with a girl who, in my opinion, probably does look like Madeleine McCann would look now. Why would they do this deliberately, when it's only by accident (the attention Wikileaks drew to John Podesta) that most of us have even heard of him?
escapefromreddit ago
This is my first comment on the sub so forgive me but... How do we know for sure how the Podesta Leaks ended up in Wikileaks hands? Maybe it wasn't an accident at all
WakeyWake ago
Podesta leaks weren't accidently given to wikileaks. Podesta leaks were an inside job, wikileaks said it was not Russians (by replying to a comment saying something like it's not nice to credit the wrong people). Separately, Wikileaks referred to the Dems ship is going down bc it has a leaklike the titanic. Or something about Dems, titanic, leaks.
I am not sure if this is an answer for you, or if I misinterpreted your comment. It's late, half asleep, lol.