You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

sheer-con ago

We should treat these images the same way law enforcement does in our presentation to the public (our "court of public opinion"). We can't convince someone of this parallel construction...it's too circumstantial and seems to be reaching to someone unconvinced of all the other damning evidence. So this should just be used as confirmation for us, and leads us on in the investigation, but should not be part of our presentations (memes, aggregations, images, etc.) to the public. It's not convincing evidence by itself and should not be submitted to the "court of public opinion".