Let me introduce you to a technique called parallel construction:
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate— "evidentiary" basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how the investigation actually began.
An example of parallel construction would be if your cell phone is unlawfully tapped to track your activity and whereabouts at a time, t, during which you committed a crime. Because this is an unlawful means by which to link you to the crime you committed at t, it would not be admissible in a criminal court proceeding. Thus, a separate (lawful, and thereby admissible) chain of evidence would be developed to show the court that at t you committed the crime. Both evidentiary paths lead to the same conclusion, but only one be used to show that you committed the crime.
On the basis strong inductive evidence, it is virtually certain that the Podesta brothers are involved in child abduction, and that the eFits are an example of parallel construction. There are three obviously shady features of the official "eFit story" worth keeping in mind:
- The eFits were supressed for five years.
- The witness testimony they were based on is dubious.
- The private investigation company that helped produce the eFits is being hunted by the Clinton-appointed DOJ.
What likely occurred is this: John and Tony were being monitored unlawfully, possibly by the NSA, or some other intelligence actor. Whoever found out what they did, wanted to leak the truth to the world, but could not reveal the means by which they found out. Thus they created the eFits as parallel evidence. That is why we now have the eFits.
It is a leak. And someone on the inside wants to help bring down this organized human trafficking syndicate. The Podestas might be key players in the syndicate. Outing them would create a domino effect.
It is a multi-billion dollar human trafficking red market operated by international regimes and cartels. Pedophilia, organ harvesting, blood storage, forced prostitution, psychiatric and pharmacological experimentation, sextortion blackmail, human donations, and yes sadistic torture for fun -- you name it -- that's what these children are put through.
It needs to be brought down efficiently while preserving continuity of government, otherwise there would be a national security crisis and multiple declarations of war.
What is our role in this? To spread the information as widely as possible. We are conditioning the public for the forthcoming crash landing. It will be talked about for the next 100 years or more.
Yes, all of the available evidence indicates quite strongly that the Podesta brothers are involved. Examine it for yourself: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
view the rest of the comments →
MeatballPizza ago
This is the video put out 3 years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9OukW44mOw
The parents sued a newspaper in England that suggested they (the parents) had suppressed the evidence of the E-fits or not given them to the authorities. The paper printed a retraction that the parents had, in fact, handed over the E-fits to investigators but said oddly 'within" a date which was a year later. So it was vague. The parents eventually settled for 55k L.
Some thoughts:
Excellent post though and one of the best thus far on this site.
Note also the investigator group hired by the parents were later convicted of squandering hundreds of thousands of pounds improperly running the investigation Who told the parents to hire them?
AreWeSure ago
My understanding is the original investigation was focused on a man seen carrying a child sometime in the 9 PM hour. However years later, they found this man and he was carrying his own child to bed. The suspect in the efits was seen in the 10 PM hour, but was originally dismissed because they thought the earlier man was the suspect.
They basically started the investigation over and came to new conclusions and that's when they released the efits and did a TV special that night.