Let me introduce you to a technique called parallel construction:
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate— "evidentiary" basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how the investigation actually began.
An example of parallel construction would be if your cell phone is unlawfully tapped to track your activity and whereabouts at a time, t, during which you committed a crime. Because this is an unlawful means by which to link you to the crime you committed at t, it would not be admissible in a criminal court proceeding. Thus, a separate (lawful, and thereby admissible) chain of evidence would be developed to show the court that at t you committed the crime. Both evidentiary paths lead to the same conclusion, but only one be used to show that you committed the crime.
On the basis strong inductive evidence, it is virtually certain that the Podesta brothers are involved in child abduction, and that the eFits are an example of parallel construction. There are three obviously shady features of the official "eFit story" worth keeping in mind:
- The eFits were supressed for five years.
- The witness testimony they were based on is dubious.
- The private investigation company that helped produce the eFits is being hunted by the Clinton-appointed DOJ.
What likely occurred is this: John and Tony were being monitored unlawfully, possibly by the NSA, or some other intelligence actor. Whoever found out what they did, wanted to leak the truth to the world, but could not reveal the means by which they found out. Thus they created the eFits as parallel evidence. That is why we now have the eFits.
It is a leak. And someone on the inside wants to help bring down this organized human trafficking syndicate. The Podestas might be key players in the syndicate. Outing them would create a domino effect.
It is a multi-billion dollar human trafficking red market operated by international regimes and cartels. Pedophilia, organ harvesting, blood storage, forced prostitution, psychiatric and pharmacological experimentation, sextortion blackmail, human donations, and yes sadistic torture for fun -- you name it -- that's what these children are put through.
It needs to be brought down efficiently while preserving continuity of government, otherwise there would be a national security crisis and multiple declarations of war.
What is our role in this? To spread the information as widely as possible. We are conditioning the public for the forthcoming crash landing. It will be talked about for the next 100 years or more.
Yes, all of the available evidence indicates quite strongly that the Podesta brothers are involved. Examine it for yourself: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
view the rest of the comments →
anonymousj ago
This is all wild conjecture, but please bear with me. I'm just repeating what I had read that is out already out there (somewhere), may have been on Voat in comments or in a blog, whatever. I'm just floating it out there. It would need investigation by someone qualified....I also remember FBI anon saying something about not only following the CF but also Big Pharma.
So, I remember reading somewhere a comment Madeline McCann had the same genetic defect that Soros had (what that is I don't know, but I do see a defect in the iris in her eye and having just been diagnosed with a genetic eye disease myself it stood out to me). Also a comment that she was conceived in-vitro - have no idea if any of that is true or not.
So I'm thinking, with the stuff about the blood bank and the hypothesis about young peoples blood perserving life...what if she was connected to that important, rich and powerful person via in vitro conception, and we know that important person is connected to people in the DNC, who would do some dirty work (kidnapping). She would have genetically the same blood/stem cells or something and her blood could be harvested (ongoing) for blood transfusions.
Wild and crazyy for sure and I feel a bit like an idiot for even thinking this. But after seeing what I've seen, who knows? I just want to go back to my stupid little life.
Celticgirlonamission ago
I've heard that she really don't have that defect...only put there so if they were questioned with the child they could say no it's not her just look at her eye it's normal...but who knows! Crazy indeed