Let me introduce you to a technique called parallel construction:
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate— "evidentiary" basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how the investigation actually began.
An example of parallel construction would be if your cell phone is unlawfully tapped to track your activity and whereabouts at a time, t, during which you committed a crime. Because this is an unlawful means by which to link you to the crime you committed at t, it would not be admissible in a criminal court proceeding. Thus, a separate (lawful, and thereby admissible) chain of evidence would be developed to show the court that at t you committed the crime. Both evidentiary paths lead to the same conclusion, but only one be used to show that you committed the crime.
On the basis strong inductive evidence, it is virtually certain that the Podesta brothers are involved in child abduction, and that the eFits are an example of parallel construction. There are three obviously shady features of the official "eFit story" worth keeping in mind:
- The eFits were supressed for five years.
- The witness testimony they were based on is dubious.
- The private investigation company that helped produce the eFits is being hunted by the Clinton-appointed DOJ.
What likely occurred is this: John and Tony were being monitored unlawfully, possibly by the NSA, or some other intelligence actor. Whoever found out what they did, wanted to leak the truth to the world, but could not reveal the means by which they found out. Thus they created the eFits as parallel evidence. That is why we now have the eFits.
It is a leak. And someone on the inside wants to help bring down this organized human trafficking syndicate. The Podestas might be key players in the syndicate. Outing them would create a domino effect.
It is a multi-billion dollar human trafficking red market operated by international regimes and cartels. Pedophilia, organ harvesting, blood storage, forced prostitution, psychiatric and pharmacological experimentation, sextortion blackmail, human donations, and yes sadistic torture for fun -- you name it -- that's what these children are put through.
It needs to be brought down efficiently while preserving continuity of government, otherwise there would be a national security crisis and multiple declarations of war.
What is our role in this? To spread the information as widely as possible. We are conditioning the public for the forthcoming crash landing. It will be talked about for the next 100 years or more.
Yes, all of the available evidence indicates quite strongly that the Podesta brothers are involved. Examine it for yourself: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
view the rest of the comments →
Freemasonsrus ago
A couple thoughts.. 1) I always assumed those were made off of actual pics. The entire story of "this is supposedly TWO different witnesses recollections of the same man have never made sense. A witness doesn't usually interpret the weight of a suspect so incredibly differently than another witness to the same person. 2) After these were released no further evidence has turned up related to Podesta's or to those images, so was someone caught out and silenced? Meaning, if we are to assume someone was attempting to steer the investigation toward them that person stopped pushing that narrative after the images were released. 3) The Freud dinner connection is simply too convenient. Why would a known pedo, who's also semi famous, insert himself into the middle of what was an international media shitstorm yet no one was aware of the dinner until Kate McCann wrote about it? I have never been of the opinion that the parents were involved. More likely there were cops on the take who obfuscated the investigation in the media or they were just plain incompetent. My guess is if they had been "in" on something as nefarious as has been suggested (in cahoots with Freud/Podesta's) than their "acting" would have been more in line with what people would expect from parents in this situation. Most of the criticism against them had to do with their supposed off behavior.
postfascion ago
Their behaviour was fishy, they looked strained, no indication of guilt obviously, by maybe an indication of pressure placed upon them. Or maybe I'm being overly suspicious of parents who lost a daughter amongst intence media attention.
Freemasonsrus ago
Well I'd just point out that the media also leads your emotions in those cases. Now that you're red pilled you may view it differently? Oftentimes it is the lens through which we are viewing something that is dictating our opinions and the MSM has done a fabulous job of blue pilling everyone. For instance, what if the talking points for the McCann's was all about how their behavior was odd and Kate wasn't crying enough ect? Then that's how we view it and absorb the info. But, if the talking points were "Kate has been heavily sedated and is in shock. She had been so hysterical the first night that they had to call in a Dr to administer meds to calm her down. They have two other children who are confused and needing stability so they are trying to remain in control of their emotions so as not to alarm them"? Also remember the Brit press is BRUTAL. (Ask Amanda Knox). And Kate in particular seems to have a classic Brit disposition where you don't wear your heart on your sleeve. Just my two cents! 😉
postfascion ago
Nah, man you're spot on. They can skew an image in any number of directions.