Let me introduce you to a technique called parallel construction:
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate— "evidentiary" basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how the investigation actually began.
An example of parallel construction would be if your cell phone is unlawfully tapped to track your activity and whereabouts at a time, t, during which you committed a crime. Because this is an unlawful means by which to link you to the crime you committed at t, it would not be admissible in a criminal court proceeding. Thus, a separate (lawful, and thereby admissible) chain of evidence would be developed to show the court that at t you committed the crime. Both evidentiary paths lead to the same conclusion, but only one be used to show that you committed the crime.
On the basis strong inductive evidence, it is virtually certain that the Podesta brothers are involved in child abduction, and that the eFits are an example of parallel construction. There are three obviously shady features of the official "eFit story" worth keeping in mind:
- The eFits were supressed for five years.
- The witness testimony they were based on is dubious.
- The private investigation company that helped produce the eFits is being hunted by the Clinton-appointed DOJ.
What likely occurred is this: John and Tony were being monitored unlawfully, possibly by the NSA, or some other intelligence actor. Whoever found out what they did, wanted to leak the truth to the world, but could not reveal the means by which they found out. Thus they created the eFits as parallel evidence. That is why we now have the eFits.
It is a leak. And someone on the inside wants to help bring down this organized human trafficking syndicate. The Podestas might be key players in the syndicate. Outing them would create a domino effect.
It is a multi-billion dollar human trafficking red market operated by international regimes and cartels. Pedophilia, organ harvesting, blood storage, forced prostitution, psychiatric and pharmacological experimentation, sextortion blackmail, human donations, and yes sadistic torture for fun -- you name it -- that's what these children are put through.
It needs to be brought down efficiently while preserving continuity of government, otherwise there would be a national security crisis and multiple declarations of war.
What is our role in this? To spread the information as widely as possible. We are conditioning the public for the forthcoming crash landing. It will be talked about for the next 100 years or more.
Yes, all of the available evidence indicates quite strongly that the Podesta brothers are involved. Examine it for yourself: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
view the rest of the comments →
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
The only part I disagree with you on is the continuity of our government. We need to abolish the CIA and institute a new government. We need a fresh country. Our's is 200 years past its expiration date.
And we should kill everyone who has been trafficking drugs out of Afghanistan or people/children from anywhere.
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
We should scrap all laws except for the constitution and start from scratch! Also go back to actual fair and speedy trials! I do not want this to be drug out with high priced attorneys who will weezle them out! Speedy speedy speedy trial! And although I oppose the death penalty I make exception for these animals!
UglyTruth ago
The main problem with the US Constitution is that it attempts to redefine the law of the land. Due process involves proper investigation.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Talk:Common_law
janedoe77 ago
Well let's re-evaluate the constitution. You have to dig something up from the roots. You can't leave the roots there, because very clearly, they are damaged/faulty. Soil needs to be rebuilt and reinvigorated with life before things can take root. Let's keep what we want and change the rest. Females need equality written into the foundation document, and we should even question the point of keeping the federal network itself together as such. We might do best as regions. I think we can think bigger, more visionary, while retaining what we know is good, such as press freedom. I think religious freedom cannot go in. Men abuse people under this and it is at the root of pizzagate. Let's keep thinking and pushing harder.
SpikyAube ago
To have press freedom, media ownership needs to be broken up. It needs to be illegal for one person/corporation to own more than one or two media outlets, otherwise you end up having a dictatorship without free press without realising it - it's just your dictators are CEOs instead of government.
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
COMPLETELY disagree! Religious freedom stops when it infringes on someone else's civil liberty. It's already like that. Most immigrants came here for being persecuted based on their religion. Shirah law is used in Muslim countries not here. Most Jehovah witnesses believe if a woman is raped and doesn't scream loud enough it's her fault. Again, currently, in this country rape is illegal no matter what! Read it. My dad used to carry a copy of the Constitution in his back pocket. It's not the constitution that's the problem. It's our corrupt court systems that do not follow it.
janedoe77 ago
Except that religious freedom gives men the right to control females, period, since the beginning of patriarchy. Are you so blind to this, as it manifests right here in Pizzagate, in so many ways? Rape is legal in most countries within marriage. Rape is not prosecuted when it is illegal. I mean, honestly, get a clue. You have GOT to understand this from the female side.
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
Not following. Can you give me an example where in this country someone was able to rape a woman by claiming the first amendment? I'm not saying there aren't some nut case men who tell there wives that but actual case law that supports what you're saying.
UglyTruth ago
The problem with the US Constitution problem can be seen as a conflict between common law and civil law. The civil law originated in Rome, and from Rome comes symbols like the eagle and fasces and political ideas like the separation of powers. The common law comes from England, but it is misrepresented by the political class as being nothing more than case law or judicial precedent.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Talk:Common_law