We need to do things right. Let the anons that know how to get potential information do their work. For the rest of us, i think we should refresh all the info is going around. In all the videos or archives I found, i can only see a part of the information. We need to add new things to those videos or archives, things like the movies produced by Alefantis, much much more info about the clinton fundation (this is the most important), links to other cases of pedo, such as the acusations to the pope francis, the story of the wikipedia founder. Everything that is potentially true and that can make the investigation look more solid, even if the info is not directly related to the pizzagate.
About the name of the investigation, i think is too late to change #pizzagate, but we can work over that name to get something better. I was thinking to use Pizzagate for the children/PG for the children (by using PG we evide saying pizzagate)/ PG no more pedo rings... something like that. We cant evide the pizzagate name, but we can hide it for the good of the investigation.
IMPORTANT: If you don't know how to gather sensible information, leave that work to the anons that know how to protect themselves out there in the jungle of the internet. The work for those who dont know how to do this things is to spread that information.
REMEMBER: If we are organize, we will be stronger than any of them.
PD: I like this hashtag: #PG #Timetosavethechildren #Whataboutthekids #PGantiPEDO
view the rest of the comments →
JeremiahSinclair ago
I'm the author of two pizzagate posts at http://aceloewgold.com. My goal there is to compile the best, most compelling, most connectable info from the investigation and summarize it for skeptics to spark them to dig more on their own, and fall down the rabbit hole and red-pill themselves. From some comments there and around the net people seem to find it credible-sounding, and all we need is for people to say "there might really be somthing to this" to red-pill themselves fully. That initial spark.
I am trying to gather enough for a follow-up but try to only include the most verifiable and effective facts vs speculative stuff.
If anyone has suggestions, with links to sources, of what I should get into the follow-up I'd love to crowdsource it. It'd make it a lot easier! SO much being discovered, but most of it I feel like I just can't include yet until it becomes more concrete. Nothing turns off newbies to this stuff as much as sensationalism, massive claims with lame sources, and wording that stinks of tinfoil hattery.
I'm going to start a new thread of my own where others can contribute their ideas (with sources, again!). This is key. We don't need everyone to believe all the research, we just need enough people to believe enough of it. I feel I can be very effective at doing this if the right info can be compiled and sourced.
Thanks all.