You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

sentryseven ago

The arch of hysteria is headless like Dalhmer's victim. It is strange that both the artist and Mr. Podesta would prefer this depiction over a complete human in the arch of hysteria pose.

The point in your argument is don't go creating strawmen and you're right, plenty have been created. I see TrutherGirls on YouTube has been shredding pizzagate suggesting that it's part of a false Flag psyop. This is because of misinformation and dangling strawmen.

stickittotheman ago

Yes, it has significance. Think about it, with everything we know about the podestas, do you think the main centerpiece of art he has hanging in his house would NOT be pedo/serial killer related? Really, ... Like ive said numerous times here, this concept of debunking is in itself BUNK.

sentryseven ago

Yes, well, I prefer the term false lead. It is more in keeping with gathering of evidence process. The term debunking implies that the entire argument has no basis whereas false lead suggests that a piece of evidence is not applicable to a line of inquiry.

stickittotheman ago

Much better! Debunking is associated with sites like SNOPES which is pure CIA disinfo. Reminds me 911 conspiracy theory "debunked". False lead i can at least agree with. We shouldnt discard anything based on conjecture.