Hey guys, first of all, I am 100% convinced there's both smoke and fire with this whole thing. It's huge. BUT
There are a lot of videos and articles out there that are repeating "facts" that have been debunked. Even if you tell someone 10 incontrovertible facts, if 1 thing is debunked, that's the only thing they'll focus on. For instance
-
a lot of people point to the "Arch of Hysteria" sculpture in Tony Podestas house and say "it's a tribute to Jeffery Dahmer..." Well, it's not. It's fucked up, but it's the artist's rendition of someone writhing violently in a psychotic fit. Source: https://www.gallery.ca/en/see/collections/artwork.php?mkey=100798
-
The "Boum Boum Room" pic isn't from Comet. It's a club (a total get drunk and fuck each other club, mind you, but a club in DC nonetheless). Very easy to be discredited if you try to point to this and say, "why is this at a family friendly pizza joint?" It's not.
-
The 14 and the fish on John PĒD-esta's hands. That photo is attached to a Wikileaks email where he says he's happy about the #14 item on a climate change agenda: protecting the oceans and sea life. Even if there's a double meaning, the fact that there's a simple explanation is enough to ruin your/our credibility if we go repeating that crap.
Point is We should STRONGLY police ourselves and have a sticky post for all debunked garbage, so we don't go ruining our own credibility. Otherwise we'll end up like 9-11 Truthers, fighting to be taken seriously for decades, and a whole lot of kids are going to become "pizza-related"
view the rest of the comments →
domestiKgypsie ago
I have to doubt the debunk of the "Arch of Hystetia." Dalmer was caught in 1991 and murdered in 1994. The "art" was rendered in 1993. It's an exact replica of Dalmer's victim; the arm and legs are expanded because it's suspended freely in the air which would stretch out the limbs, the victim in the photo was collapsed on the mattress. "Bourgeois makes this highly vulnerable position even more so by suspending her male figure from the ceiling. In choosing to represent him in an attitude traditionally associated with the female...."
Dalmer's victim was male, note the protruding pelvic bones and ribs, exactly the same. Maybe Bourgeois was inspired by the photo? Look at the time frames. She was commissioned by Carnegie (whole other can of worms). Either way, it's very very easy to connect her sculpture with the photo.
WatcherWatcher ago
The artist was inspired by a French psychologist in the 1800s. (See article link about sculpture above). That psychologist drew this and this was her inspiration https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/a9/0e/17/a90e17d96a38303be62b6a0c0d10553e.jpg