You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

anon123 ago

Well Pizzagate started with WikiLeaks emails. That means Assange was faked and spent 10 years of building credibility just for the sole purpose of leaking emails with pizza and hotdog and handkerchief code word in it. All while risking and losing an inevitable presidential campaign by purposefully putting her emails on a private server. They also find a pawn to run a random pizza parlor for 8 years and change his name to "I love children" in french and tell him to put up creepy Instagram photos and book creepy bands for events. All in the sake of hoping some random suspicious internet users can find the code in their email and keep connecting dots on clues just so they can ramp up censorship. Idk, seems pretty unrealistic to me.

bangbang ago

A false flag here would be used as a cover up. Also to discredit the organizations that jumped on #pizzagate and scrutinized CPP as libel and defamation. It's obvious that MSM networks are losing the trust they used to have, they're being revealed as the propaganda machines they are. They're losing viewership to alt-media and the internet, so they'd poison the well, as a way to staunch the bleeding, as it were.

anon123 ago

But risk losing the presidency in the process? Doesn't sound like a logical risk/reward to me.

0rion ago

I agree with your assessment. But consider this: wouldn't losing the Presidency for 1-2 terms be worth it if it meant total censorship of the internet, thus resulting in a return to old media that the elite have total control of?

anon123 ago

I don't think they could gain total censorship with Trump in office. Plus there's also risk of public catching on to "corrupt Hillary in general" but not to "Pizzagate specifically". Also risk of backlash. But yes, if they could somehow pull that off, total censorship while Trump in office, it would probably be worth it.