Picture of James Alefantis with Australian paedophile who travelled to the U.S. for underage sex (pizzagate)

submitted ago by brazzersgate

**PLEASE READ: The man in the picture has been confirmed to be a totally different guy who plays rugby in Washington, and is not convicted paedophile Michael Quinn.

Instead, I've started looking into Dan Roberge who commented on Alefantis' photo. Another user posted this link to a photo he found with a creepy guy on Roberge's Insta: http://archive.is/D39g2

I did some research and this guy's name is Septime Webre. Webre was artistic director of the Washington Ballet for the past 17 years before stepping down to take up a role at the S&R Foundation. I went to Septime's Instagram, searched his following/followers list: him and James Alefantis follow each other.

From the comments on Alefantis' Insta photo of the three men, Roberge commented 'who are these guys?' Alefantis quickly replied, "You know", and "We'll wait for you." This either means Alefantis was saying Roberge actually does know these two guys, or more likely he was saying he doesn't actually know them, but instead their intentions.

What relationship do Septime Webre and James Alefantis share? As Alefantis commented on the photo, "you know", implying that Roberge knew the exact reason why those guys were meeting Lynch, does this implicate the two men in the photo (one already probably confirmed to be Ian Pope)? **

Hi all,

I'm an Australian who's been following this for a few days and just wanted to let you guys know there are people like myself from all over the world who believe in your cause and want to see these sick fucks taken down.

I was browsing through an album of screenshots taken of pictures from James Alefantis' Instagram, and I instantly recognised one of the guys in the photos: http://i.imgur.com/OYrExq0.png

This could already be common knowledge, but I thought I'd throw it out there just in case. Midway through this year, an Australian man was arrested in a police sting after travelling to LA to have sex with a six-year-old boy. Here is the link to the article on this case: http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/crime/melbourne-paedophile-and-rugby-player-michael-quinns-us-sentencing-delayed/news-story/bb3501bf59f34f5190f86de628638be9

I believe the person on the right in the photo with Alefantis is Michael Quinn. Not only does this person look identical to the picture of Quinn that appears half way down the news article, he's even wearing rugby shorts in the photo. Quinn was travelling in America with an Australian rugby tour at the time of his arrest.

While the screenshot of the photo from Instagram says 97 weeks ago, this could potentially mean that Quinn's arrest wasn't the first time he travelled to America to participate in child sex. What does everyone think?

EDIT 1: Fixed link

EDIT 2: Sorry guys, I was mistaken - the guy in the middle is not Alefantis but his close friend Christopher Lynch, owner of L'enfant Cafe.

EDIT 3: For those not convinced the man on the right of Alefantis' photo isn't Michael Quinn, here's a side by side comparison of their faces: http://i.imgur.com/0cJzktk.jpg

EDIT 4: People have tracked down the logo on the footy shorts and found it belongs to the Washington Irish FC. Here is a team photo of their squad in 2015: http://i.imgur.com/rC1fDrn.jpg

The guy on the left of the Instagram photo can be found second from the far right in the front row, and another user has commented saying he thinks the guy on the right of the Instagram photo (who we believe is Quinn) can be found 13th from the right in the team photo. It sure does look like him, however I've made another picture comparing the beard shapes of Quinn, the questionable guy in the Instagram photo and the guy in the team picture. Quinn and the mysterious guy share the same beard shape (sort of M shape), while the rugby player has a W shaped beard. Pic here: http://i.imgur.com/xO5XAEU.jpg

EDIT 5: There's a very good chance this could be a dead end, as people have found the mysterious man on the right of the photo could be Ian Pope, a Washington Irish rugby player. Here's the comparison here: https://anonm.gr/?a39f.jpg

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kekgate ago

yeah thats him. notice the #rugby in pic comments. good work anon.

edit: Man on right may actually be Ian Pope

oresd ago

Excellent catch. While not perfect, this certainly seems conclusive.

It connects Alefantis to a known pedophile. #Rugby, how would he know that? Wow.

Excellent, excellent work. This is exactly what this forum needs instead of this satanic crap connecting Clinton to aliens.

This is a GREAT find.

roundhouse1776 ago

Except the Satanic stuff is just as real as the pedophilia stuff and they directly tie together. Who gets to decide that's it's important to expose one thing and not the other?

Warnos44 ago

I think oresd means that people are more likely to listen to pedo to pedo connections vs satanic or alien "conspiracies".

Free_Radical ago

Maybe but that's irrelevant. You go where the evidence leads. Focus-testing it for soccer mom demographic would be counter-productive.

RageGoddess ago

Why would that be counter productive? Ideas and products don't just "take off" and become popular without carefully constructing the messaging around them. People will more readily share content that is framed in ideas they're already familiar with (pedo and cp) as opposed to satanism/occult stuff. Soccer moms don't want that on their FB or IG feeds.

Free_Radical ago

Wrong approach. It's not a line of products that have to be sold and compromised for an extra shekel.

You present the truth, the way you see it, and make sure it's as informative and clear as possible - you don't remove pieces of that truth because they might be, theoretically, inconvenient. Some demographics will be curious about the occult leads.

RageGoddess ago

True, it's not a line of products. However, you're mistaken in the idea that strategically controlling and shaping the narrative of pizzagate will somehow compromise the truth. Far from it. If the narrative is not controlled by the researchers, then someone else will do it...that's for sure. We have limited resources. Let's focus them on the areas that will generate the most potential legal action. Satanism is not illegal. Occult magic is not actually real and is also not illegal. The abuse is real, the pictures are real, so researchers, imho, should focus there. That's all. Cheers.

Free_Radical ago

Ideas and products

carefully constructing the messaging

content that is framed

strategically controlling and shaping the narrative

Let's focus them

Let's not.

These kinds of movements only work as a thousand-headed, ever changing, hydra (think Anonymous or Gamergate). You can't co-opt a group without leadership. You can't lead it astray if they're already moving in all directions.

RageGoddess ago

"These movements only work as a thousand-headed, ever changing, hydra"

And the evidence for that claim is Anon and Gamergate? But Anon has official media channels to distribute their highly targeted, carefully constructed messaging. The only way Gamergate is similar in any way to this current pizzagate investigation is that it also had no leader or centralized mouthpiece.

You can't co-opt a group without leadership.

Bro, have you even read any of the info on JTRIG? There are a number of highly effective strategies to control the narrative, disrupt investigations, and derail discussion in disorganized online forums just like this one. Forum sliding is one of them.

Here's my final comment and I'll let you have the last word since I've already made my point several times. Satanism/occult is part of this, yes, BUT we have limited resources. We should focus our resources on the angles/leads that will produce the most actionable evidence. Satanism is not illegal. Occult is not illegal. Therefore, we should focus on the actual illegal activities like pedophilia and cp. Cheers and good luck.