Surprise, surprise: @ploppy cited the exact same source (while ignoring all other sources we shared here) from you to claim it's a hoax (until proven otherwise, you two are the same exact person). All the vague interpretations that favor the accused aside, could you explain the following:
1. Explain to me why the kids were able to describe (with drawings) the whole cult activities with a high level of detail; 2. Why the judge and the police involved deliberately overlooked/avoided to examine if those accused have the tattoos on their body parts as described (which are THE MOST EASILY VERIFIABLE evidence to prove their innocence/guilt); 3. Why the entire MSM block related documentaries and video evidence in the UK; 4. Why the school involved changed their entire staff; 5. Why those suspects are no way to be found online after this.
They were kidnapped.. taken abroad videos are over 4 weeks off brainstorming.
Whilst being abused, it with spoons, water torture. Punched. Suffocated.. Came home continued the videos.
Thats how they got the ideas in there head.Forced down them by the mum and boyfriend during a divorce... Boyfriend had previous for child abuse and admit abusing these children whilst '"BRAINSTORMING"
You cant say people are guilty because they wont show you there penis.. Or I can say you rapwe kids my proof is you have a smurf tattoo on yourt penis.. Only way to proof im not lying is for you to take photos of your penis... No you make the claim you provide the evidence. Cant demand people drop there trousers based on a story you need actual evidence.
IT WASNT
To avoid death threats and further agro doesnt proof there guilty your claim
Because there sick of being called pedos over and over and over... they did speak, I spoke to them for one..
Baseless accusation. Tell me how they exactly executed that master plan and cite your source;
That's the easiest way to clear their names, but the judge intentionally overlooked it. The court can't demand people to drop their pants? They absolutely can, since the children included the drawings/descriptions in their testimonies.
Do you live in the UK?
Clearly if that's false, they have nothing to worry about. Changing all the entire staff just because of a HOAX? I guess you have more reasons to be skeptical about this, don't you?
I live in the UK too and concluded it was PROBABLY a hoax. Respect for doing more than just an armchair investigation. I just think lim2016 has confirmation bias. Anyway, im moving on. lim dont reply to me. Cheers.
view the rest of the comments →
PLevi ago
I helped do this report I did Homestead investigation Keelan did the work on Holly Grieg
Sorry guys it was big fat stinking lie I could be wrong I spent 6 months covering it
Every lead was a red hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D1dADiDYFU
llm2016 ago
Surprise, surprise: @ploppy cited the exact same source (while ignoring all other sources we shared here) from you to claim it's a hoax (until proven otherwise, you two are the same exact person). All the vague interpretations that favor the accused aside, could you explain the following: 1. Explain to me why the kids were able to describe (with drawings) the whole cult activities with a high level of detail; 2. Why the judge and the police involved deliberately overlooked/avoided to examine if those accused have the tattoos on their body parts as described (which are THE MOST EASILY VERIFIABLE evidence to prove their innocence/guilt); 3. Why the entire MSM block related documentaries and video evidence in the UK; 4. Why the school involved changed their entire staff; 5. Why those suspects are no way to be found online after this.
PLevi ago
llm2016 ago
PLevi ago
Abe and Ellas own interview and Sabine on CCN
ploppy ago
I live in the UK too and concluded it was PROBABLY a hoax. Respect for doing more than just an armchair investigation. I just think lim2016 has confirmation bias. Anyway, im moving on. lim dont reply to me. Cheers.