I am undecided but open minded about this. Lets debate this like adults. Not name call so we can work through it TOGETHER. If the posters in this thread can answer all the questions in the video above, instead of shouting shill, I might be more convinced. Go for it guys.
It seems like you've never wanted to address all the fundamental questions I asked yesterday:
1. Explain to me why the kids were able to describe (with drawings) the whole cult activities with a high level of detail;
2. Why the judge and the police involved deliberately overlooked/avoided to examine if those accused have the tattoos on their body parts as described (which are THE MOST EASILY VERIFIABLE evidence to prove their innocence/guilt);
3. Why the entire MSM block related documentaries and video evidence in the UK;
4. Why the school involved changed their entire staff;
5. Why those suspects are no way to be found online after this.
You don't want us to shout shill? Simple. Don't act like one.
My answers:
1. The parents trained them to do this.
2. Dont know.
3. To protect possibly innocent people. Innocent until proven guilty.
4. Dont know.
5. Dont know.
Now, your turn, answer the questions in the video. Being sceptical does not equate acting like a shill. Learn the difference or I cant see how we can move forward if you say shill in every post which you have so far. I was honest in my answers above with regards to what i know and don't know. You will not make me listen to you if you keep saying shill. I will simply walk away from the discussion. You want to convince people, then you are going the wrong way about it. Clearly, I am not the only one who has problems with this story so lets talk about it.
"1. The parents trained them to do this. 2. Dont know. 3. To protect possibly innocent people. Innocent until proven guilty. 4. Dont know. 5. Dont know."
Good luck convincing people with these LOLable answers. Innocent until proven guilty as a general rule? Agreed, but we are not in court, and we are trying to decide who's more likely the bad guy here, and all the hard facts are not on your side.
The fact that you don't even care to listen to the children and examine the other side of the story suggests that you're a shill. I don't care about your feeling and stop sabotaging our investigation unless you come up with good counter-argument. It's just wasting our time.
Ooh look, You said shill again. Mr predictable. LOL. I have watched the videos. I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. You need to calm down. I am asking for the questions in the video I posted to be answered. Which you have again ignored. Again. I feel like you are wasting my time too so lets leave it there.
I've watched the links you posted. Now do me a favor - read mine. If you come up with any sensible explanation to the main claims here, I will be happy to discuss further. Until then, don't reply to me.
view the rest of the comments →
PLevi ago
I helped do this report I did Homestead investigation Keelan did the work on Holly Grieg
Sorry guys it was big fat stinking lie I could be wrong I spent 6 months covering it
Every lead was a red hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D1dADiDYFU
ploppy ago
I am undecided but open minded about this. Lets debate this like adults. Not name call so we can work through it TOGETHER. If the posters in this thread can answer all the questions in the video above, instead of shouting shill, I might be more convinced. Go for it guys.
llm2016 ago
It seems like you've never wanted to address all the fundamental questions I asked yesterday: 1. Explain to me why the kids were able to describe (with drawings) the whole cult activities with a high level of detail; 2. Why the judge and the police involved deliberately overlooked/avoided to examine if those accused have the tattoos on their body parts as described (which are THE MOST EASILY VERIFIABLE evidence to prove their innocence/guilt); 3. Why the entire MSM block related documentaries and video evidence in the UK; 4. Why the school involved changed their entire staff; 5. Why those suspects are no way to be found online after this.
You don't want us to shout shill? Simple. Don't act like one.
ploppy ago
My answers: 1. The parents trained them to do this. 2. Dont know. 3. To protect possibly innocent people. Innocent until proven guilty. 4. Dont know. 5. Dont know.
Now, your turn, answer the questions in the video. Being sceptical does not equate acting like a shill. Learn the difference or I cant see how we can move forward if you say shill in every post which you have so far. I was honest in my answers above with regards to what i know and don't know. You will not make me listen to you if you keep saying shill. I will simply walk away from the discussion. You want to convince people, then you are going the wrong way about it. Clearly, I am not the only one who has problems with this story so lets talk about it.
llm2016 ago
"1. The parents trained them to do this. 2. Dont know. 3. To protect possibly innocent people. Innocent until proven guilty. 4. Dont know. 5. Dont know." Good luck convincing people with these LOLable answers. Innocent until proven guilty as a general rule? Agreed, but we are not in court, and we are trying to decide who's more likely the bad guy here, and all the hard facts are not on your side.
The fact that you don't even care to listen to the children and examine the other side of the story suggests that you're a shill. I don't care about your feeling and stop sabotaging our investigation unless you come up with good counter-argument. It's just wasting our time.
ploppy ago
Ooh look, You said shill again. Mr predictable. LOL. I have watched the videos. I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. You need to calm down. I am asking for the questions in the video I posted to be answered. Which you have again ignored. Again. I feel like you are wasting my time too so lets leave it there.
llm2016 ago
I've watched the links you posted. Now do me a favor - read mine. If you come up with any sensible explanation to the main claims here, I will be happy to discuss further. Until then, don't reply to me.