You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

piratse ago

You should really be archiving ALL those pages dude. Also, as I have said for a while, this whole thing is likely more about: money laundering, arms trades, people trafficking, and a little bit of pedo shit thrown in. I don't know why everyone is tunnel visioned on a pedo ring as the end game, when the evidence continues to point to selling kids, drugs, arms, and hiding money. The pedo stuff is just the cherry on top for some bored billionaires (don't kid yourself, with their hidden assets they are all billionaires). I AM NOT SAYING THERE IS NO PEDO STUFF, it's pretty clear there is (and proof from old arrests etc), but I think people will have better luck connecting it all if they do as the anon above did and follow the money! Here's my personal and made up slice of the pie:
40% money laundering/payoffs
20% arms/drugs trade
20% human trafficking
10% pedo parties
10% connecting businesses with similar interests so that it's easy to keep track but hard to trace

save_thechildren ago

Wikileaks started a new research/investigation site......you guys might want to put all this stuff over there..

piratse ago

Wikileaks is VERY suspect right now. VERY. They REFUSE to show Assange proof of life for a month at this point. And we get VERY weird excuses. Then they change their codes. They can't be trusted right now. Assange may be making a deal. Their "proof" is that the cats twitter had updates... But no photos or videos of Assange. He is most likely alive, but probably not at the embassy, that's why the stall.

lookingfortruth ago

If there are any very solid connections to be made based on the wikileaks evidence, why not put them on the research site? It could be in both places, here and there, and since wikileaks is known as credible, it could add structure and credibility to the investigation. Regardless of what has happened to Assange. Unless I'm missing something important.

totorox ago

wikileaks is known as credible

not anymore.

add structure and credibility to the investigation

This is not how it works. You bring up a smoking gun and let it viral out, you don't play PR and tone-policing. The latter backfires heavily, allowing disrupters to take control and neutralize the popular investigation and interest.

What you're suggesting is old media: "credibility" and deception work. If you wanna play fakery, you're on the wrong team. Even "looking good by using the credible channels" is part of fakery. Let them run the stories as they wish, they are powerless in front of the network-based tidal wave of content. As soon as you rely upon them for content-polishing and -publishing, they own you and you are working for the pedos.

lookingfortruth ago

too bad I don't have a downvote yet.