You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SpectraDatum ago

Quite a bit. It is a pain to sift through. Basically, it implicates anyone you can think of who is super rich, but tying a shell company to financial transactions is difficult, let alone specific illegal ctivity. But, the easiest way is to start searching up names, then the addresses of anything you think is suspicious.

As in the Podesta connection to the Uranium One scandal. It is a smoking gun for treason and Hillary Clinton, and even though the New York Times did a good story on it, the public didn't react. And people shout SMOKING GUN so much that it has lost meaning.

But, as far as treason, the Panama Papers are the smoking gun.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

http://observer.com/2016/04/panama-papers-reveal-clintons-kremlin-connection/

http://freebeacon.com/issues/panama-papers-implicate-podesta-client/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_named_in_the_Panama_Papers

Sleuth222 ago

even though the New York Times did a good story on it

Is this your first day?