You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

cakeoflightylight ago

Not enough evidence to convict in a court of law my ass. I've seen people convicted based on a police officer's opinion even when they were completely obviously innocent. The legal standard for a criminal conviction is beyond a reasonable doubt. There is no reasonable doubt here. Reasonable doubt - how a reasonable man would judge the weight of the evidence. Not how a brainwashed Hillary supporter would judge the evidence. If there is NO DOUBT that is different from beyond a reasonable doubt. Beyond a reasonable doubt leaves room for some small amount of doubt, but only a small amount of unreasonable doubt. At this point I'd say if any reasonable person looks at the collected evidence, there are like 100 smoking guns. And that no reasonable person could ignore the collective evidence. The hard part will come in getting the FBI to prosecute, without cutting so many deals that these people remain free to kill and kidnap again. A massive effort needs to be made to put these people in prison for the rest of their lives. Not some fucking probation agreement with a sex offender registration. A sex offender registration does no good when the victim is a 10 month old stolen from her crib or a child snatched off the street and you have Laura Silsby deciding whether to allow the police to go catch them or not.