I am a former mod and top contributor at the original r/Pizzagate -- nobody knows who the mod here is ("KingKongisWrong"), his origin is mysterious and he is censoring tons of work (pizzagate)

submitted ago by LegionWill

I'm not trying to cause division here, but my posts along with many others are being deleted.

This mod "KingKongisWrong" is deleting things despite users giving them positive evaluation.

I'm not going to say he is a shill, but it is clear he is subjecting all of us to his arbitrary whims. He deleted my call for international collaboration specifically pertaining to Pizzagate, despite the fact that others upvoted it.

KingKongisWrong refuses to tell people where he came from or what his (her?) history is. Maybe understandable, I suppose.

We do know this much: the censorship is extremely heavy-handed and as a result it is decreasing contributions to this investigation; a perfect way to stifle us.

KingKongisWrong, you need to understand that you cannot just delete things because you personally disagree with them. It is right to look out for obvious shilling, such as the "jewish conspiracy" material, but you cannot just delete legitimate discussions because you don't like them. That's going too far and is beyond the scope of your responsibility, particularly when those discussions are voted up by others.

I'm pointing this out for the sake of the longevity of the investigation.

I have tried to contact KingKongisWrong privately and he is unresponsive. I hate to post this publicly but he (or she) left me with no other option.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago

Then let them fucking spam. There's enough smart people to deduce if it is truly spam or not. The biggest problem at this point, are peoples concerns about authority. There isn't a god damn reason, to justify these mods are better than the last. That being said, I'm not attacking these mods.... I'm attacking the notion that any few people should be filtering information that THEY deem irrelevant. If one person deems something irrelevant, it doesn't mean someone else can't deem it super relevant, based on the investigation they've conducted.