You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

citizen444 ago

Raytheon is a colossal part of the military-industrial complex, you can connect virtually every important person in DC with them.
But I commend your work, especially digging around attorneys/DOJ members who happen to drop cases involving pedorings...

dontkillmehillary ago

I agree. Tying peeps to Raytheon is easy, but what struck me with this is that there is a direct line from the Franklin scandal, which allegedly involved the trade and torture of minors, to the Podestas through Stephens. That's an anomaly worth looking into.

I think all these pervs travel in the same circles, so making connections is going to be pretty easy. I think, however, if we are going to find real breaks in pizzagate we need to look at guys like Stephens.

There is a HUGE spotlight on the big players like CPP, Podestas, Clintons, etc. They have mountains of cash and support to clean their tracks. Finding a break with them now is going to be near impossible because we have lost the element of surprise.

The weak links in the chain are those not expecting examination. Stephens has been coasting along for 25+ years with no one looking closely at his activities. If there is dirt on him he likely won't be as dilligent cleaning it up like HRC. The odds of a breakthrough are much greater with him. edit Also, these old school guys aren't as savvy with computers, so they have digital weak points.

I'm going to start tracking some other names mentioned in the Washington Times article to see who else pops up on the pizzagate radar. Stephens was literally the first guy I looked at.

edit One word of caution here too.... Raytheon is a defense contractor. Defense contractors are notoriously vigilant on keeping shit quiet. Investigating companies like this definitely will, raise the likelihood of "accidental suicide"

citizen444 ago

Sorry to insist, but Raytheon must have hundreds if not thousands of politicos/lobbyists/journalists working for them. There is no way we can use this connection in a meaningful way. Money flowing in all directions is totally normalized, Tony Podesta received millions for lobbying on behalf of Saudi Arabia for example. So all these claims will be easily dismissed by NYT, WaPo, Bloomberg journalists as ravings coming from ppl who don't know how "business is done".
I agree with you, we must focus on specific persons whose DOCUMENTED actions were INSTRUMENTAL in helping "human trafficking" like Stephens or Silsby.

KingKongisCTR ago

I disagree. I think seeing who is chosen to investigate the trafficking may even be more important than the traffickers if you had an understanding of how they work. Trafficking doesn't take much skill and can be replaced easily. Scummy lawyers pretending to be good guys aren't as easy.

citizen444 ago

My comment was about the link DC attorney<->Raytheon<->Podesta which I consider weak and distracting , not about the ATTORNEY himself who deserves some investigation about the reasons why he acted as a FIREWALL preventing the Franklin scandal from contaminating DC.