You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

pizzaparallel ago

I think it's good to post things like this but the way the information is presented is not very effective imo.
I tried to watch it but so much time is spent (in a 34 minute video) simply scrolling through pictures and slowly reading captions, I couldn't even make it all the way through. It seems like he doesn't debunk as much as playdown the possible significance of various things.

Maybe I just don't have the attention span to sit through this ... sorry :\

In the interest of making the information more easily accessible, do you think you could summarize what points he debunks?

I understand that might be an unreasonable request given the length of the video. If that's too much, can you maybe comment on some of the points that stuck out to you as most significant?

xeemee ago

In the interest of making the information more easily accessible, do you think you could summarize what points he debunks?

like you, i also did not have the patience to sit through the whole thing, but only because i found several problems with his "logic" in the first 9 minutes

lisa_doyle ago

He also spoke like he was very familiar with Podesta and Abramovic...He called her Marina. He didn't seem objective. He isn't a random person trying to give his honest opinion. He seemed very knowledgeable about the people, like he knew them.

xeemee ago

i thought that to be a possibility too but i didn't catch the reference to Marina - that's public knowledge though i assume (i don't know - haven't been really following this thing)