Apologies if this has been brought up before. I just now stumbled upon this information. All of the explanations I have seen in regard to the 14 and fish on his hands in this picture pointed to the occult (such as in this video, among other places). I thought it was plausible at the time. Today though, I did some looking of my own, and this is what I found:
This is the email which that image was attached to. The last line reads "My favorite of the #GlobalGoals? No. 14— we must protect our oceans and life below water #SDGs".
After Googling, I found this page on globalgoals.org and this page.
So, the 14 represents Global Goals's #14 goal, "life below water". And notice how similarly styled the fish is on both that website and Podesta's hand.
Mystery solved, in my opinion.
I'm not trying to debunk pizzagate in its entirety. I think there are many strange things that deserve being answered and looked into. I'm just trying to do my part in uncovering the truth, regardless of which side it comes down on. The explanation I've provided seems much more plausible to me than the previous popular explanation.
view the rest of the comments →
party1981 ago
I think this was the cover that Podesta used to justify posting this picture.
The memo about protecting oceans, that's like pizza. Pizza is innocent. Oceans are innocent. They provide cover for Podesta to publicly advertise his criminal behavior. He's basically winking at the camera.
Consider all of these things:
Then take those 3 points, and add them together with everything else we know about Comet Ping Pong and child trafficking. And ask yourself if John is really just talking about oceans. And pizza.
piratse ago
Okay, to what end does this do anything for him? If he's in a pedo ring, he doesn't need to post pictures to twitter, make a matching document, post it to his website, attach it to a charity.... so he can communicate with the people he already knows? He can call them, send an email, meet them at the next fuck party. Even if you are correct, there isn't a clear enough connection here. It's just speculation and interpretation. You can build the Everest of speculation, and it will do nothing. They had to get Capone on tax evasion because they only had speculation of his criminal activity. Get the proof. the rest is a circle jerk to confirm your suspicion.
party1981 ago
I completely agree with you that it is not hard proof. I'm not suggesting otherwise. One last thing to consider: even if he is referring to oceans, how bizarre is it to write symbols on your palms, hold them up with a creepy grin, take a picture, and post it to Twitter? I look at documents, memos, etc., and I never draw symbols on my palms about them and then tweet a picture of my palm symbols. Even if he's just referring to oceans, it's still fucking weird. And that weirdness itself is a clue.
piratse ago
You also don't run a giant charity that does publicity. I'm not saying it's super normal but it's also not that weird. Likely "hey we should draw that on your hands and totally post it to twitter, it will be awesome." Creepy grin is just his grin, irrelevant. Posting it to twitter is the thing that makes it the least likely to be anything nefarious. Hes ALREADY IN a secret group (supposedly) there is NO REASON he would post it to signify some occult shit. The people in the group already know he's in. It would serve ZERO purpose to any pedo ring, but it would service a purpose to his shitty clean water initiative. I'm choosing the most logical one. Not everything is a signal.
party1981 ago
Why do they put pedo symbols in pizza restaurant logos? They're winking at us. It's like this is the first time.
piratse ago
Two things come to mind: 1) coincidence. A LOT of companies have logos that look like the pedo logo. That triangle and hand in hand was around before pedos adopted it. The images come up a lot if you look around. Did ALL the companies connected have pedo logos? If not then why only some? because it could just be that sometimes those logos are used and some were bound to be used in companies connected to Washington elite. 2) They use it on physical locations because people GO THERE. It would be very stupid for a politician involved to wear a necklace that signified being a pedo, but the place he's told to go is verifiable by the logo. It's a marker. But a person using it to mark themselves is very easy to use as evidence and considering how smart these people are about it, I doubt they would invite the scrutiny on purpose.
these are my opinions and I fully accept I could be wrong. I love to discuss the potential of what is found because the what if is fun, but to push the "investigation" to a point where it's both believable and factual to the average person, we have to weed out this kind of shit that we can't prove and it's all conjecture. We can use it to get to the next thing. But going down the rabbit hole while getting no evidence is never going to get us anywhere.
party1981 ago
You like to argue. Nobody is saying that we can prove that the fish/Podesta picture proves that pizzagate is real. We're saying that all of the evidence (1000 items of circumstantial evidence), when taken as a whole, justify serious further investigation. And, based on this mountain of evidence, we cannot assume that Podesta wasn't winking at the camera. Maybe he was talking about oceans. Probably he was talking about oceans. Or maybe he was winking at the camera, signaling an allegiance to a creepy occult cannibal group that he is a member with together with his brother Tony, who hangs Dahlmer statutes in his home and gives cannibal paintings to his brother for his office. Maybe.