PART ONE OF THREE.
Ok guys, I am going to point out some Q&A from FBIAnon on 4chan that hasn't been explored in relations to Pizzagate. There were 7 Q&As (that I know of) over about a 4 ½ month period, early July to very late October.
It is very long, so I have to do it in multiple parts.
WATCH FOR “Forum Slide” ON THIS ONE. (If you don't know what “forum slide” is, look it up.)
But first, the TL;DR
TL;DR: FBIAnon alludes to all of the following having connections to pizzagate:
1) Search the e-mails for the following code words: cards, favors, extras, officers
2) George Soros' connection to Tavistock Institute, and their connection to the Clinton Foundation.
3) “London Connection” to CF
4) Saudi Arabia and Qatar connections to CF
5) State Department officials who donated to the CF
6) The Bonner Group
7) Henry Paulson, TARP, major bank that went under as a result of TARP
8) USAID
9) CF investment deals in Africa, specifically countries that have poor records of births
10) Accounting firm who did the books for Haiti's earthquake relief
11) Majescor company
12) Muhammad Yunus (warning: it is inferred that FBIAnon thought this one would be very dangerous)
13) Scalia's murder, what he was looking into when he died, and it's relation to the CF.
14) FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act) on Monsanto, GMO, and HRC. (No idea why FBIAnon thought this was important.)
15) Mark Lamont Hill
16) Barack Obama Foundation, and O'bummer's brother.
17) Projects funded by the CF, where the receiver was small, in a failing industry, and who had people owning/working for it that donated to the CF
18) A “certain Indian businessman” who has been “routinely accused of pedophilia”
19) Cheryl Mills (and where she worked before joining the CF)
20) “Gates, Buffett, Soros, African kings, the Royal family”
21) Elisa Lam (unsure about this one, may not be related)
22) “Zika, Abbot Labs, Gilead” (may be red-herring, or related to population control)
23) Helge Traasdahl/Tapad (may only be connected to election rigging)
24) The Cohen Group
25) Brookings Institute/2014 CHARGE projects
26) The company that put together the advertisement for HRC with all Avenger celebrities.
27) “What constitutes Mark Cuban's net worth?”
28) Lester Holt is a journalist who can be trusted (according to FBIAnon)
29) ALL members of the GOP who lead the “coup” against Trump.
30) Dirty money funneling to CF via 501(c)4, 527, and 4847(a)1 companies/trusts/foundations
31) State Department officials who met in secret with foreign officials
32) “Who is affiliated with the BoD for M Partners, and do they have ties to the CF?”
33) Was the TPP fast-tracked to aid in transporting children across the Pacific? (totally stolen personal idea from an associate.)
I hate leaving it at 33, because of the connotations of that number, but I can't think of anything else to put in or leave out. Sorry.
I will put the question by 4chan Anons like this: “Question: Question by 4chan”
The answers by FBIAnon will be “FBIAnon: Answer by FBIAnon”
Any of my comments in the quotes will be in parenthesis, like so: “(My incredibly astute comment)”
All of the full questions and answers were put together by someone else, I just make the link available to you. https://mega.nz/#!GlRkhbTT!bsjwIdm6QBtcM5YOxZtfxUvNlAPkn1Vp0BAvQxeSfmk
(Edit: First two pages of this doc: https://sli.mg/5P38Su https://sli.mg/siM6Lg )
Remember, FBIAnon says he will mix bullshit with truth, so he will have plausible deniability in case he is suspected of leaking info.
To begin, know that you are experiencing pushback not just from the bad guys, but from the good guys as well. Why?
Question: “>the entire government to be brought down >I very much doubt this. “
FBIAnon: “She has SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war. “
Question: (Anon user quoting FBIAnon) ““There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders. There is enough for her and the entire government
(ENTIRE GOVERNMENT!)
to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.”
(Anon's Question:) “Fuck you for not doing your duty to the people, you jaded amoral fucks. You’ve blown what little trust I had left that there were still decent patriots left in the government. You fuckers are gonna let the biggest, most corrupt cunt take the highest office in the land. You think that won’t bring this country down? Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you”
FBIAnon: “I will put it to you this way: You have three choices:
A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth
comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and
we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences out
government, and a civil war begins.
B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so
the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.
C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.
I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail”
Question: “At bare minimum, you need to do B. If you can’t at least make examples of people, the
existence of the FBI is pointless. Start with the most corrupt, like Clinton (and, I presume Feinstein), and each year, choose 3-5 new people with any level of power to indict. Do this until people start
retiring. Don’t RICO the entire federal government. You have the option to do it slowly, so do it
slowly.”
FBIAnon: “But if we do it slowly, people like you will get mad that we are not working fast enough.”
Question: “Could the release of this information cause a Civil War in the USA? Leak it. Do it. The day of the rope is nigh”
FBIAnon: “Yes.”
If the above is true, the good guys are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they expose it all at once, we get war with foreign countries, as well as civil war. I'm not saying they are right or wrong in their assessment, only that this is what the good guys in government believe.
So, don't be discouraged that you are experiencing censorship from all sides. Keep at it! What is your inducement to keep at it (aside from saving those poor kids)? This.
Question: “...Has /pol/ ever found out anything that the FBI didn't know before the FBI did?”
FBIAnon: “...yes.”
Things will change on January 20th. If not, there's always this: https://mega.nz/#!mspAzSpZ!LraJDYVt7S9t3j0ZQcxwQ66wU6GeOWPOqHscYqpOFec (Edit: first two pages of this doc: https://sli.mg/GZ8Vcg https://sli.mg/HzmLRx )
Now that I have laid a little foundation, we get to the parts that are related to Pizzatgate.
Question: “Simply put. Soros owns Tavistock. Tavistock owns the government. ...”
FBIAnon: “Someone is on to something.” (IMO, This means that Soros and Tavistock Institute is wrapped up in Pizzagate as well.)
Question: “Ok. Do tell. What about the human trafficking? I assume that those who can be indicted
are involved.”
FBIAnon: “Pedophiles and sex traffickers everywhere. Many politicians trade girls like cattle.”
(We are looking at top-level politicians in this. Congress, Federal Judges, FBI agents, CIA/NSA agents, police officers, local, state, and federal. Don't just limit the investigation to guys who own pizza joints.)
Some of you who have tried contacting police are getting blown out. Here is why.
Question: “I want to believe you, Anon…What are the chances that the army will go along with Obama’s call to martial law? Do you know anything about how the military department feels about it?”
FBIAnon: “Red team planner. Military will defect in large numbers should they be compelled to act against their own population. However, the police will not. They are not trained to reasonably react to a situation, only to follow objectives and pursue targets. It is a very different mentality from the military, hence the militarization of the police. They are to be feared.”
Question: “... Are there any more places to focus on? ...”
FBIAnon: “… 4- The London connection, not enough attention to Saudi Arabia, Qatar breakthroughs are a focal point. ...” (Remember the twitter girl named Molly? And how she said a lot of the child porn featured Arabs? Connect those back to the Clinton Foundation.)
view the rest of the comments →
Sir_Chancealot ago
PART THREE OF THREE
Question: “Does the human trafficking have to do with keeping people in line? Is that aspect of the CF the place where people get vetted/get their membership in “Hydra”? Is the child trafficking for blackmail/dead-man’s switch/enforcement files as well as recreation?”
FBIAnon: “1) Yes. 2) Yes. 3) Yes.” (Even if you think something has to do with weapons, intelligence, or pay-for-play, it is absolutely going to lead to child rape/trafficking.)
Question: “...Wonderful, I went on a frenzy about that in the first editions of /cfg/. Follow up set of questions: What connection does Cheryl Mills and the BlackIvy group have to the Foundation? More sex slaves, or the possibility of blood diamonds, slave labor, and jungle work? Mills was allowed to keep her clearance after she left the State Department. Seems suspicious she is on the board of the CF and running a “development” group.”
FBIAnon: “(Cheryl) Mills is almost as important as Abedin. Where did Mills work before joining the CF?”
Question: “What do the Clintons want from Kosovo? Why is it so important to them?”
FBIAnon: “What does Kosovo represent on the geopolitical chessboard?” (Again, nothing concrete, but something is telling me this is specific to the child trafficking. Maybe check the laws on import/exports from that area?)
Question: “Any other exorbitantly rich families we should be looking into other than the obvious Rockefeller, Rothschilds, Saudi senpai etc?”
FBIAnon: “Gates, Buffett, Soros, African kings, the Royal family.” (Let's play connect the dots. CF is interested in plains of Africa. Gates' foundation is “vaccinating” children in Africa. Coincidence?)
Cryptic FBIAnon quote: “... Elisa Lam had proof of something, but no one got a chance to listen to her.” (Did Elisa Lam stumble onto something she shouldn't have? At a cursory look, nothing stands out, but maybe a centipede can flesh it out.)
Question: “Any connection to Gates Foundation, CF, Big Pharma, weaponized cancer, tainted polio/malaria vaccines, Africa, Dr. Mary Sherman, fucking Oswald…? Is Kissinger involved with the CF kiddie trafficking? Harking back to the Blue Grotto days. These threads really fuck with my head. Collusion theory overload.”
FBIAnon: “Zika, Abbott Labs, Gilead.”
Question: “What is the owner of Tapad, Are Helge Traasdahl’s relationship to all this? His name popped up a bit in the DNC leaks.”
FBIAnon: “Yes.” (Although FBIAnon answers in the affirmative when someone asks about Helge Trasshadl being involved in election rigging, so this might not have much to do with pizzagate.)
Question: “How many people has the CF had killed in this election?”
FBIAnon: “At least 14.” (Another time, he says 14 or 16 confirmed, 20 suspected.)
Question: “The Cohen Group: hot or cold? ...”
FBIAnon: “1) Hot. ...”
Question: “...The Brookings Institute. How evil is this organization? Is 2014 CHARGE project (combined Brookings and Clinton Global Initiative) used to launder money? ...”
FBIAnon: “2) CHARGE was used for weapons and people.”
Salient quote by FBIAnon: “...Everyone thought they couldn’t make a difference, now the MSM is openly trying to frame this board and others as right wing extremists to discredit us. That should send a clear message as to how threatening this board actually is.”
Question: “...Could you name some companies/people/events we haven’t looked into already but are worth digging?”
FBIAnon: “...2) What was the organization that put together that ad for HRC with all the celebrities? What major figure who endorsed HRC has business interest tied to the Clinton Foundation? What constitutes Mark Cuban’s net worth?”
Question: “Was Hillary involved in Scalia’s death at least? Does the Clinton kill list theory have merit?”
FBIAnon: “...The Clinton Kill List is very, very legit. ...” (Be safe guys, and cover your tracks when you are investigating these things. Use proxy/tor/etc., and look up how to do so safely and effectively. Also, sometimes, people forget to change your MAC address.)
Question: “...but this Lester Holt guy may actually be fair.”
FBIAnon: “Holt is a pretty stand-up journalist. He knows what his role is.”
Salient FBIAnon quote: “The CF always operates in countries where birth records are difficult to maintain. Let that sink in for a moment.” (Someone could research all the countries the CF operates in, find out how spotty birth records are, and meme that shit.)
Question: Is the shit posted on this site legit? http://www.thecitizensaudit.com/”
FBIAnon: “It is asking the right questions, and yes, many of HRC’s PAC’s and even her campaign solicit foreign money and shadow money.”
Salient FBIAnon quote: “...And, as an aside, when you are reading Podesta’s e-mails, remember that the Clintons deal in weapons, drugs, and people. Some terminology in use is far more nefarious than many of you suspect.”
Question: “Can you give any more insight into Scalia’s death?”
FBIAnon: “The common assumption is Scalia was murdered to help bring about gun control via another justice. But then any justice could have been sacked. What was Scalia doing before he died? What topic was he interested in?”
Question: “Did the GOP leaders pull a coup attempt so they have legitimacy to block him during his first term?”
FBIAnon: “They attempted a coup because they are bought by the same interests as the Dems. ...” (This means that the Republicans involved in the coup attempt are into the same things as the Clintons)
Question: “Was the Moloch shit ever worth looking into? I remember the Masonic anon talking about the Owl of Minerva, etc. and the connections to the NOW.”
FBIAnon: “The Owl of Minerva is an important gesture in upper circles.” (The word “gesture” implies that it is either a literal gesture, or a symbolic gesture. If it is a literal gesture, for example a certain color worn, or a certain hand movement, then you could identify involved elites from this gesture. If it is a symbolic gesture, then you will see it in written communications, and hear it in conversations. Someone needs to contact someone like Texe Marrs or Vigilantcitizen.com and get their take on it.)
Question: “How is foreign/dirty money funneling into Clinton’s PACs? Are they using their 501(c)4’s?”
FBIAnon: “Yes, but sometimes there are 527’s and 4947(a)1’s.” (The 4947(a)1's seem to be related to trust funds, but I am not a CPA. Someone from that kind of background should look into those as they relate to the CF.)
Question: “(Code words to search for in the e-mail leaks. Two answers were combined.)”
FBIAnon: “Cards, favors, extras, officers”
Smorecocoa ago
Is climate change/ climategate real...meaning this is an attention grabber or massive coverup for a nationwide cooperation that's not really about climate change. NASA NOAA these organizations have posted faulty data and been caught multiple times by groups such as Breitbart, Infowars, Glenn Beck. I'd like the "potential source" to answer if I'm on to something...
ghtdak ago
Climate change is a hoax. Its all about wonderful new regulations that cover absolutely everything. Human breathing is a threat (perfect!!).
Oh, and lots and lots of money in international carbon exchanges
LargePizzaWithGate ago
Climate change can be thought of as a euphemism for solar radiation management. This is a term used in policy circles for a "conspiracy " term people use in the alt-media and alt-communities.