This isn't really an apologetic article. It is akin to saying "Rape fantasy is not rape". Paedophilia is sexual attraction to 'sexlessness'. The state before secondary traits manifest.
I am not seeing anything in the article immediately as incorrect, or somehow 'wrong'. It is true that in the US very little effort goes into prevention of things, in part because of the stigmas attached. So, paedophiles tend to either become predators, or wind up in a situation they think will keep them from transgressing (such as becoming a priest), often to bad results.
Paedophilia is a mental illness. It is not an issue until some form of practice-because every sane person agrees that "Thought Crime" is bullshit.
So.. What exactly is the objection? Is this just witch hunting? The article is from a bit over two years ago. It isn't some form of deflection over the pizzagate stuff that is ongoing...
view the rest of the comments →
lordtyp0 ago
This isn't really an apologetic article. It is akin to saying "Rape fantasy is not rape". Paedophilia is sexual attraction to 'sexlessness'. The state before secondary traits manifest.
I am not seeing anything in the article immediately as incorrect, or somehow 'wrong'. It is true that in the US very little effort goes into prevention of things, in part because of the stigmas attached. So, paedophiles tend to either become predators, or wind up in a situation they think will keep them from transgressing (such as becoming a priest), often to bad results.
Paedophilia is a mental illness. It is not an issue until some form of practice-because every sane person agrees that "Thought Crime" is bullshit.
So.. What exactly is the objection? Is this just witch hunting? The article is from a bit over two years ago. It isn't some form of deflection over the pizzagate stuff that is ongoing...