"Under the legislation, a 24-year-old grown man would be able to sodomize a 14-year-old boy and claim it was “consensual.”
You don't need legislation for that. Only retards want to believe that consent can only exist if they personally agree with it.
Of course, 14-year-old children cannot consent to sodomy — or vote, smoke, drink, drive, sign contracts, and so on — because they are children,”
Wrong. They can't "consent" to these things because they are the slaves of the United States government, who also do not allow grown men to "consent" to trading firearms for example.
“No sex between a 24 and 14-year-old is consensual,”
Wrong. Your permission is not required for someone else to give consent.
view the rest of the comments →
Stubbabubba ago
Try to touch my son. You'd bring about the end of the world.
noob_tube ago
You're overestimating your abilities.
Stubbabubba ago
You're childless.
uvulectomy ago
He's a degenerate, oven-worthy pedophile.
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
noob_tube ago
Your definition of rape.
The actual definition of rape.
Try again, loser.
Stubbabubba ago
Why have I been getting sucked into nonsense fucking arguments on here lately? Am I the only goat left?
uvulectomy ago
No sense in arguing with degenerates like him. Best to just see him for the oven-fodder he is and stay aware.
Stubbabubba ago
He isn't the only one. Seems like every comment I make I have the kikes up my ass. This site has soured