I spend enough time here to know that an Islamist terror group in Alabama with dead kids littered around, is probably not satire. I don’t understand what you mean
Majority of the porn in the internet is of underaged girls. It’s sick, sad and twisted but it’s true. And loli porn is technically legal, but definitely degenerate. I’m not sure what the clip is that you guys are talking about so I have no opinion. I think Dortex was just implying that if you don’t like the rules, change them. Butyou cant make butt-hurt over someone playing with the boundaries. In fact, we should encourage it. Let the pedos have a place to be open about their degeneracy so at least we can identify them and their behavior. That faggot that you guys are arguing about is for sure a pedo, but your arguments about what can or can’t be posted on a free speech site is a little more nuanced. I think pedos should be punished to the extent of the law but it’s tricky when we start going all minority report over someone posting drawings of anime faggotry. Also, homeschool your kids.
a fetish clip of a child being raped from XYZ movie, but, it got posted to a porn sub, only for users to go "WTF why are you posting child pornography", after which it was very quickly deleted, since that clip would get the account hammered for peddling CP
the user who posted the clip, i should mention:
-is also known being a virulent pedophile
-has a penchant for pron involving literally murdering schoolgirls and fucking the corpse
-once tried posting teen porn, then got offended people hated him for it, and tried to beg compensation votes
dortex thinks the source of the movie matters here, and some other user found the title, but regardless of where it came from, it got posted as porn and feature a child being raped
dortex defended the post saying "he broke no rules", when WTF that's CP
I know about fuark’s affinity for pedophilia from past users complaint about it. Morally I agree with you. In terms of on the site, loli isn’t illegal, saying you want to murder school girls isn’t illegal (because if it was saying you want to kill jewslims and spiggers would be too). As far as posting an out of context clip to a porn thread, that’s why we have downvoating. If it was against the subs guidelines then yeah, for sure, delete it. But otherwise, the entire reason for this website is for conversations like this. It’s a place for dissonant conversation. When the day of the rope comes, you and I will be on the right side of the gallows, but for now we kind of have to let the pedos expose themselves and just take note, in my opinion. If that’s the kind of person fuark is then his life is already probably living hell. Can you imagine being that degenerate? He knows what he’s doing is wrong and just wants company in misery. I think Dortex isn’t meaning to defend pedos, just the rights that all people have until convicted of crimes. Also one of the biggest reasons I stopped watching porn was I realized just HOW MUCH porn is underaged and allowed on sites like pornhub, motherless, Xnxx, etc. Even on voat we have a bunch of people talking about how some guy is going to be lucky to fuck that 14 year old Soph girl. It’s a fucked up time. But it makes it easier to know who is trying to resist and who is leaning into the degeneracy.
it doesnt matter if dortex is right on that point or not one single bit, if he's being dishonest about shit. he presents context in a certain way under a certain claim, knowing damn well he's lying about it in effect. the shitskins a fucking snake
Yeah man it sounds like your much more interested in the dramatic details than of the overarching lesson to be learned. You can’t let other people’s actions, dishonest or not, weigh so heavily on you. If you’re discerning correctly then take solace in that. That’s all you can do.
Posted automatically (#39555) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
You know what. You’re so abrasive and defensive, you can’t even have a conversation with someone who agrees with you. Fuck off and enjoy your mental prison.
No. I don’t watch pornography and haven’t for over two years you self righteous retard. I was making the claim that a huge chunk of pornography is meant to simulate pedophilia. Jews are trying to fuck with our ability to discern. It’s up to you to discern, you can’t be mentally immature and just want some website to do all the work for you you weak minded faggot.
The classic “no u” argument. Cool bud. This conversation is fruitless. You just wanted someone to hate on random people on the internet with. My ability to empathize is a part of my armor. You want to combat an enemy? Know how he thinks.
Yeah but there’s two kinds of people in that category, people who know why they hate (((them))) and people who just hate (((them))) because they are everyone else doing it.
view the rest of the comments →
con77 ago
Another one!!!???
Thisismyvoatusername ago
Yup. Same suspects, but this was a previous camp before they got busted in New Mexico (with remains of at least one other kid).
auchtung ago
Fml, i thought this was a joke at first.
theHubrisOfMan ago
weird sense of humor, but okay.
Dortex ago
You clearly don't spend much time here.
theHubrisOfMan ago
I spend enough time here to know that an Islamist terror group in Alabama with dead kids littered around, is probably not satire. I don’t understand what you mean
Dortex ago
We make darker jokes all the time.
theHubrisOfMan ago
The real joke would be finding out that the child remains were a result of a domestic dispute.
Dortex ago
I like you.
theHubrisOfMan ago
I knew we would find some middle-ground, fellow goat.
theoldones ago
Dortex is a pedophile defender
https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/3212165/18556699/
theHubrisOfMan ago
Majority of the porn in the internet is of underaged girls. It’s sick, sad and twisted but it’s true. And loli porn is technically legal, but definitely degenerate. I’m not sure what the clip is that you guys are talking about so I have no opinion. I think Dortex was just implying that if you don’t like the rules, change them. Butyou cant make butt-hurt over someone playing with the boundaries. In fact, we should encourage it. Let the pedos have a place to be open about their degeneracy so at least we can identify them and their behavior. That faggot that you guys are arguing about is for sure a pedo, but your arguments about what can or can’t be posted on a free speech site is a little more nuanced. I think pedos should be punished to the extent of the law but it’s tricky when we start going all minority report over someone posting drawings of anime faggotry. Also, homeschool your kids.
theoldones ago
context: he lies about the situation by making things seem one way, in order to stop people going after Aged
another user points out solid proof of him being a vote manipulator
theHubrisOfMan ago
What was the clip you guys were arguing over?
theoldones ago
a fetish clip of a child being raped from XYZ movie, but, it got posted to a porn sub, only for users to go "WTF why are you posting child pornography", after which it was very quickly deleted, since that clip would get the account hammered for peddling CP
the user who posted the clip, i should mention:
-is also known being a virulent pedophile
-has a penchant for pron involving literally murdering schoolgirls and fucking the corpse
-once tried posting teen porn, then got offended people hated him for it, and tried to beg compensation votes
dortex thinks the source of the movie matters here, and some other user found the title, but regardless of where it came from, it got posted as porn and feature a child being raped
dortex defended the post saying "he broke no rules", when WTF that's CP
theHubrisOfMan ago
I know about fuark’s affinity for pedophilia from past users complaint about it. Morally I agree with you. In terms of on the site, loli isn’t illegal, saying you want to murder school girls isn’t illegal (because if it was saying you want to kill jewslims and spiggers would be too). As far as posting an out of context clip to a porn thread, that’s why we have downvoating. If it was against the subs guidelines then yeah, for sure, delete it. But otherwise, the entire reason for this website is for conversations like this. It’s a place for dissonant conversation. When the day of the rope comes, you and I will be on the right side of the gallows, but for now we kind of have to let the pedos expose themselves and just take note, in my opinion. If that’s the kind of person fuark is then his life is already probably living hell. Can you imagine being that degenerate? He knows what he’s doing is wrong and just wants company in misery. I think Dortex isn’t meaning to defend pedos, just the rights that all people have until convicted of crimes. Also one of the biggest reasons I stopped watching porn was I realized just HOW MUCH porn is underaged and allowed on sites like pornhub, motherless, Xnxx, etc. Even on voat we have a bunch of people talking about how some guy is going to be lucky to fuck that 14 year old Soph girl. It’s a fucked up time. But it makes it easier to know who is trying to resist and who is leaning into the degeneracy.
theoldones ago
this aint even the about that issue
it doesnt matter if dortex is right on that point or not one single bit, if he's being dishonest about shit. he presents context in a certain way under a certain claim, knowing damn well he's lying about it in effect. the shitskins a fucking snake
theHubrisOfMan ago
Yeah man it sounds like your much more interested in the dramatic details than of the overarching lesson to be learned. You can’t let other people’s actions, dishonest or not, weigh so heavily on you. If you’re discerning correctly then take solace in that. That’s all you can do.
theoldones ago
pedophiles need to hang, and i have to assume dortex is one given his actions.
the shitskin deserves the rope
theHubrisOfMan ago
Have you ever masturbated to a “Snapchat selfie”? Or any porn titled with the word “teen” in it?
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#39555) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
theHubrisOfMan ago
Wow what a white knighting faggot. You should see if CNN is hiring. They love out of context quoting.
theoldones ago
no, that shits underage, why the fuck would do i that illegal shit?
if you actually fucked a teen you'd go to jail, dumbfuck.
i_scream_trucks ago
mmmmmno.
perfectly legal to fuck an 18/19 year old. as in eight-TEEN and nine-TEEN
theoldones ago
i have enough reservations about you to say that doesn't clear you
theHubrisOfMan ago
You know what. You’re so abrasive and defensive, you can’t even have a conversation with someone who agrees with you. Fuck off and enjoy your mental prison.
theoldones ago
you just attempted to claim masturbating to teenagers is normal behaviour
if we fucking searched your computer right now, would we find child pornography? yes or no
theHubrisOfMan ago
No. I don’t watch pornography and haven’t for over two years you self righteous retard. I was making the claim that a huge chunk of pornography is meant to simulate pedophilia. Jews are trying to fuck with our ability to discern. It’s up to you to discern, you can’t be mentally immature and just want some website to do all the work for you you weak minded faggot.
theoldones ago
can i offer the suggestion to you perhaps, that you worded something very badly here, and that let's hope "no" is a truthful answer?
theHubrisOfMan ago
Honestly, you’re so defensive, It makes me skeptical. Like the anti gay politician that gets caught blowing dudes at a truck stop.
theoldones ago
you suddenly attempting this type of projecting is making me suspicious.
theHubrisOfMan ago
Also I have never seen or interacted with that account before and this is my only account.
theHubrisOfMan ago
The classic “no u” argument. Cool bud. This conversation is fruitless. You just wanted someone to hate on random people on the internet with. My ability to empathize is a part of my armor. You want to combat an enemy? Know how he thinks.
theoldones ago
firstly fuck off and stop being unclear here, what does any of this have to do with anything?
would you like to clarify what you meant by asking:
what intent should i be reading in this question?
theHubrisOfMan ago
I explained it two replies ago.
theoldones ago
i'll delete my posts linking this, but perhaps you should have worded it slightly better, slightly sooner
theHubrisOfMan ago
I thought we were having a dialogue. Didn’t know I was on trial.
theHubrisOfMan ago
Pretty good talk though overall. All the best niggerfaggot
theoldones ago
a lot of users dont take kindly to certain types.
theHubrisOfMan ago
Yeah but there’s two kinds of people in that category, people who know why they hate (((them))) and people who just hate (((them))) because they are everyone else doing it.