Why do I get the feeling that this is all a false flag with one of the aims being to deflect attention from kikes onto their mudslime proxy, exactly as they've been trying to do unsuccessfully with (((Tommy Robinson)))?
I want this to be an organic attack but it's starting to look a little too (((slick))) for that.
Right but if he inspires more people than all that has to happen is we point out that the invaders didn't magically appear here... he mentions the globalists etc... I believe he wasn't confident enough to put anything in there about (((them))) that could be picked apart as conspiracy theory and destroy the rest of his argument. If in doubt leave it out. His manifesto is solid... read it.
No but it could have discredited his argument. Shooting Muslims and blaming Jews would be used to discredit him.
He blames globalists and invaders, both of which include (((them))). Whilst not naming them directly he didn't leave them out... read the manifesto I think believing he is a mossad shill is far fetched and doesn't make much sense.
Globalist is a meaningless term to those you argue he is trying to redpill.
Globalism is a symptom of judaism. Again, the true cancer remains hidden and here are the (((usual suspects))) rushing to defend the elephant in the room.
Loads of people are naming the jew. This man just took out 50 invaders and wrote a redpilling manifesto... if you believe this is a mossad setup then you can easily use this publicity against them... just keep naming them as the bringers of the invaders... that's why I don't think it is.
view the rest of the comments →
LampshadeMaker ago
Why do I get the feeling that this is all a false flag with one of the aims being to deflect attention from kikes onto their mudslime proxy, exactly as they've been trying to do unsuccessfully with (((Tommy Robinson)))? I want this to be an organic attack but it's starting to look a little too (((slick))) for that.
ThyCultOfQ ago
Read his manifesto... guy seems legit. I get your point but that would be a bad hand to play right now... seems organic to me.
LampshadeMaker ago
Not acknowledging the driving force behind multicult, for someone as exposed to the chans as he appears to have been, is hard to ignore.
ThyCultOfQ ago
Right but if he inspires more people than all that has to happen is we point out that the invaders didn't magically appear here... he mentions the globalists etc... I believe he wasn't confident enough to put anything in there about (((them))) that could be picked apart as conspiracy theory and destroy the rest of his argument. If in doubt leave it out. His manifesto is solid... read it.
LampshadeMaker ago
Naming the jew would not have invalidated the bleeding obvious - that slimes don't belong here.
ThyCultOfQ ago
No but it could have discredited his argument. Shooting Muslims and blaming Jews would be used to discredit him.
He blames globalists and invaders, both of which include (((them))). Whilst not naming them directly he didn't leave them out... read the manifesto I think believing he is a mossad shill is far fetched and doesn't make much sense.
LampshadeMaker ago
Globalist is a meaningless term to those you argue he is trying to redpill. Globalism is a symptom of judaism. Again, the true cancer remains hidden and here are the (((usual suspects))) rushing to defend the elephant in the room.
ThyCultOfQ ago
Loads of people are naming the jew. This man just took out 50 invaders and wrote a redpilling manifesto... if you believe this is a mossad setup then you can easily use this publicity against them... just keep naming them as the bringers of the invaders... that's why I don't think it is.
whysosensitive ago
You make some valid points.