You guys are bickering about dumb stuff and are completely missing that the two men who were involved in an armed standoff with police are the son and son-in-law of the WTC bombing imam. The women are their wives. The 11 children are the grandchildren of the WTC imam.
You are also missing that this whole group has connections to Clinton insiders.
I figured it out on my own just by googling around. Media and police should catch up in a few days, then you'll get confirmation and article links from third parties you trust at that point. I know all their names, relationships, and why they were hiding out and who from. Also, there's probably a hit out on them by this point and if the FBI doesn't figure this all out and take over the case immediately the two men won't last long in prison.
So it's just speculation on your part. It really doesn't make sense either. Why would the children be treated so horribly if they were hiding them to protect them?
No it's not speculation at all, it's research. The children weren't being treated horribly intentionally. The group was in hiding not only in the most remote place they could think of, but complete with impromptu bunker using the truck they drove out there. They ran out of money and food, which is what happens after nine months when you build a bunker and have 17 people and only six months of provisions.
view the rest of the comments →
BistroPalin ago
You guys are bickering about dumb stuff and are completely missing that the two men who were involved in an armed standoff with police are the son and son-in-law of the WTC bombing imam. The women are their wives. The 11 children are the grandchildren of the WTC imam.
You are also missing that this whole group has connections to Clinton insiders.
InnocentAngels ago
Can you post a link or show proof of this?
BistroPalin ago
I figured it out on my own just by googling around. Media and police should catch up in a few days, then you'll get confirmation and article links from third parties you trust at that point. I know all their names, relationships, and why they were hiding out and who from. Also, there's probably a hit out on them by this point and if the FBI doesn't figure this all out and take over the case immediately the two men won't last long in prison.
InnocentAngels ago
So it's just speculation on your part. It really doesn't make sense either. Why would the children be treated so horribly if they were hiding them to protect them?
BistroPalin ago
No it's not speculation at all, it's research. The children weren't being treated horribly intentionally. The group was in hiding not only in the most remote place they could think of, but complete with impromptu bunker using the truck they drove out there. They ran out of money and food, which is what happens after nine months when you build a bunker and have 17 people and only six months of provisions.
viperguy ago
EVERYTHING BistroPalin LEAKED IS eerily now TRUE as a few hours ago! Dailymail says all BistroPalin's wild claims are solid facts today :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6032935/Pictured-Chilling-mugshots-three-mothers-arrested-New-Mexico-extremist-Muslim-compound.html
InnocentAngels ago
Blown away by his knowledge about this. Incredible! My apologies to you too, if you know what I'm talking about.