You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Fambida ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiding_and_abetting

Hmmm, http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/crime-enter-illegally.html

But is it actually a crime for illegals to REMAIN in the US after having committed the crime of entering illegally?

That seems like a determining factor in whether we can slap this cunt with hundreds of charges for aiding and abetting.

torhent ago

Not seeing much that can be done about that. It would require a federal law being passed about people being negligent in their job and preventing criminals from being arrested. It is possible she could be charged under some tangential law, but it will be harder to stick.

I'm more for creating border control around cities that pull this shit. Want to be a Soros Sanctuary City, no fucking problem. We will enact a wall around your city and set up border control for entry to and from, we will check our ports for immigration as well as your flights. You will need a passport to leave your city to enter the actual US. Enjoy the inconvenience and the business loss fucktards. But you will be able to keep your pet illegals, they aren't going anywhere, just your tax base who will flee to go to a city that is actually part of the US. Do you think Amazon would move to Austin if the city had border control and a wall built around it? No they would not, would the sanctuary status be dropped, it would be dropped over night once the wall went up. I'd also pay for the wall with Federal funds directed towards the city as well.

Kregan ago

I agree with most of your post and would support not physical walls being built around cities as that is not pragmatic, however swamping their perimeters with border patrol and ICE would def do the trick of haulting business and we know the power of the all mighty dollar. The sanctuary cities would change their tunes over night. As for your comments on needing a federal law passed about negligence of doing ones job. I disagree, it is already an egregious violation of their oath of office that all elected officials take and are subject to as well as a violation of obstruction of justice on several levels. Other than that I am on board with what you posted and thank you. Take care and be easy.

torhent ago

I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure if that lady can be persecuted (I'd say prosecuted but I want her persecuted frankly) under current federal law. I believe if she could be, Trump would've slammed the living F out of her already but he hasn't.

speedisavirus ago

There are already laws for willfully interfering with law enforcement operations. She violated them.