You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

The only good Jews are the dead ones, and the unicorns that sterilize themselves, infiltrate and destroy their own kind, then gas themselves.

You know what your kind does, and you have the option of allowing it to continue, or supporting the one race that's most likely to get us off this rock before a global extinction event.

The holocaust was a hoax, and the number of people realizing this are growing exponentially.

Get fucked, kike.

TruthSeeker2 ago

I am German. My Grandma told me about her own experience. It was a horrible time. Why would she lie to me? My family is catholic not jewish. We have lived here for about a thousand years. So we are at least as German as anybody else. My greatgrandfather was even a mayor during the time. My grandfather on the other side was a Nazi soldier. And not just him. Other relatives of mine, too. But let me tell you: I have seen the historic site of a concentration camp. You can visit them today. I invite you.

Crensch ago

I am German. My Grandma told me about her own experience. Why would she lie to me?

1) She's a woman.

2) She's related to you

3) Pity points, or importance/status points for being the old cunt in the room with the big life stories

My family is catholic not jewish.

1) I don't believe you.

2) I don't care.

3) If you're not Jewish, then you're a beta cuck faggot that can't even handle the smallest amount of questioning of the axioms of your life. You're an NPC-tier useful idiot.

We have lived here for about a thousand years.

How insanely irrelevant to anything, yet you bring it up as if it could lend weight to anything you have to say. Is this how arguments are won where you're from, kike?

So we are at least as German as anybody else.

Cucked, apparently. If you live in Germany, and are actually German, your ancestors fought and died for the land you are now handing over to sandniggers. How fucking pathetic.

My greatgrandfather was even a major during the time.

So? Are you also a woman? I'm asking because you keep bringing up completely irrelevant shit. A major... in what?

My grandfather on the other side was a Nazi soldier. And not just him. Other relatives of mine, too.

Your great grandfather was a major... somewhere that is undisclosed by you, and your grandfather was a Nazi soldier. Right. Oh, and "other relatives of mine" that nobody seems to care about.

Let me guess, you're going to tell me that they told you all about the holocaust? The thing that it is illegal to question in many countries for some completely legitimate reason? Right.

But let me tell you: I have seen the historic site of a concentration camp.

So?

You can visit them today. I invite you.

I've no reason to go and listen to kike lies about the ancestors of the current abortion of German people. Nazis were fucking heroes, and the allies fucked everything up.

TruthSeeker2 ago

The thing that it is illegal to question in many countries

Nobody watched us.

The problem is you don't care about the truth. So let me just link you to historic sources - even though I assume you are going to deny it anyway.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-evidence-that-proves-beyond-reasonable-doubt-that-the-Holocaust-occurred

If you don't want to read here's a picture: https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Eb_E-jDZ3VM/V-l6NDeu5cI/AAAAAAAAAS4/7jt306M8xio8MJv6fJ8lby5lic5tnVicgCLcB/s1600/baumh.png

Crensch ago

Nobody watched us.

This makes no sense in any context I can possibly think of here. Try again.

The problem is you don't care about the truth.

The problem is that I was force-fed the holocaust lie, and found out it was wrong. I'm sure enough that it's wrong to be just fine weathering the "looney conspiracy theorist" responses of normies around me.

So let me just link you to historic sources - even though I assume you are going to deny it anyway.

Historic. Sources. Right.

http://archive.is/8HQFH#selection-703.4-707.377

Several people, both in the comments and in other answers have leapt on the fact that Höss was beaten when he was first arrested and, to varying degrees, tried to argue this somehow invalidates his entire testimony. This is the standard way that Deniers brush aside all of Höss' evidence and a few of those using it here have the stench of Denier around their comments.

Others, however, simply don't seem to have thought their comments through. When Höss was captured his captors already knew who he was. His wife also confirmed it, but he continued to maintain he was a farmer called Lang (knowing that admitting to being Rudolf Höss was tantamount to a death sentence). This was when some of his captors beat him up until he admitted who he was.

Emphasis mine. A shit-tier QUORA (historic, my ass) response about one single admittedly tortured guy.

https://imgoat.com/uploads/369853df76/33486.png

Tells me nothing at all. One picture? BRAVO you absolute retard, you've managed to convince precisely no one of any part of the holocaust lie.

TruthSeeker2 ago

QUORA

You have to read all of it. The second answer is by a professional historian and that's where the links to more sources are (a ton).

"looney conspiracy theorist" responses of normies around me

I'm far from it. In fact I like original thinking. But I'm an original thinker myself and the evidence seems to point very clearly in the direction of the holocaust having happened.

Crensch ago

You have to read all of it. The second answer is by a professional historian and that's where the links to more sources are (a ton).

Two. Two sources.

https://archive.is/o/8HQFH/www.jewishgen.org/databases/holocaust/

Jewishgen, "An affiliate of the MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE - A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST" yeah, no bias there or anything.

Nobody would buy that as a source, faggot.

Second source? a wiki Literally can be edited by anyone. And no, I'm not going to go through and debunk an entire wiki because you hand-waved to it. I know you're going there, so I'm heading that off before you even try - attempting to hold me to that is a dishonest way to argue something.

I'm far from it. In fact I like original thinking.

You have serious context issues.

But I'm an original thinker myself and the evidence seems to point very clearly in the direction of the holocaust having happened.

No, it doesn't.

Defend your lie of a holocaust, faggot. That entire submission was made for faggots like you to defend your stupid fantasy.

Go for it.

TruthSeeker2 ago

Two sources.

Just because it's on the same web site doesn't mean it's the same source. If you click one of the links there are more links to other sources and so on. But I'll help you. Here's a link to the original diaries of Joseph Goebbels - the right hand man of Hitler. He talks among other things about the holocaust in it. I assumed you'd find the German original more credible. But you can search for a translation or use google translate if you don't speak German.

http://www.1000dokumente.de/index.html/index.html?c=dokument_de&dokument=0118_gob&object=translation&l=de

faggot

No, you are a faggot! (Arguing like a 5-year-old: Check.)

Crensch ago

Just because it's on the same web site doesn't mean it's the same source. If you click one of the links there are more links to other sources and so on.

It's pretty dishonest of you to have me go from source to source to source when you're too lazy and pathetic to do so for your own argument. I could hand-wave you to google and say, "you're wrong, google it. YOU do the work to prove yourself wrong because I'm a lazy fuck that can't present my arguments with sound sources, you're just going to have to believe me!"

But I'll help you.

Oh, THANK YOU for HELPING ME since if you were even halfway honest, you'd have supported your claims instead of trying to foist the work onto me. If you're not a Jew, you sure as fuck act like one.

Here's a link to the original diaries of Joseph Goebbels - the right hand man of Hitler. He talks among other things about the holocaust in it. I assumed you'd find the German original more credible. But you can search for a translation or use google translate if you don't speak German.

Yes, LET ME HELP YOU by linking ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FORTY SIX WORDS that you can parse through to find support for my argument.

You dishonest. Fucking. Kike.

And no, there was no reference to the fucking holocaust, you liar.

No, you are a faggot! (Arguing like a 5-year-old: Check.)

Calling you a faggot has nothing to do with my argument, you fucking kike. It's not an argument at all, it's a label that fits you currently-living cucked Germans who are swallowing Jewish and sandnigger cock daily.

TruthSeeker3 ago

Well, linking to my own posts isn't a very reliable source either. Reliable sources tend to be longer than one sentence, sorry. Something I quickly managed to find in the diaries at least, is the following:

Der Führer hat angeordnet, daß 2[5]-30 000 Juden sofort zu verhaften sind.

In English: The leader [Hitler] issued the command to incarcerate 2[5]000 to 30000 Jews immediately.

I can also recommend you the following book as I think you would believe Nazis more than anyone else: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_the_Third_Reich

Crensch ago

In English: The leader [Hitler] issued the command to incarcerate 2[5]000 to 30000 Jews immediately.

Nobody is refuting that Jews were incarcerated, you absolute fucking retard. Of course they were. What the fuck do you think the holocaust was supposed to be? Certainly not merely being incarcerated, you dishonest kike.

What a little bitch you are, strawmanning my position so you can knock it down easier. Is that the best you have?

I can also recommend you the following book as I think you would believe Nazis more than anyone else:

You're admitting that you cannot support your own arguments.

"read this book cuz it says things i cannot say here because i am too stupid and ignorant of the subject matter to present them to you" <--- that's what your words seem to be saying

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_the_Third_Reich

In the book, as at the Nuremberg Trials, Speer denied any knowledge of the Holocaust.

From. Your. Link. You. Dishonest. Prick.

Do you even know what a source is supposed to do? It's supposed to support the position you hold, not just cause the other party to be caught in an avalanche of bullshit that doesn't support your position.

"Hey, here's stupid-fuck-claim X and here's my SOURCE (that totally doesn't support stupid-fuck-claim X)"

That's more or less your presence here up to this point.

TruthSeeker3 ago

i cannot say here

Well, I did say them but you wouldn't believe me. So I have to link to someone that you consider more credible than me.

In the book, as at the Nuremberg Trials, Speer denied any knowledge of the Holocaust.

Now you're just obviously lying. This is nowhere on the site. I searched it. This is ACTUALLY from the site:

He goes on to say that at the Nuremberg Trial he stated he "...had to share the total responsibility for all that had happened," and that he "...was inescapably contaminated morally..." Finally, Speer states, "Because I failed at the time, I still feel, to this day, responsible for Auschwitz in a wholly personal sense."[1]:506-507

AND there is a citation from Albert Speer.

Crensch ago

http://archive.is/QMEhw#selection-773.0-777.2

It's an archive of your fucking link, you lying kike. 3/4 of the way down the page, RIGHT UNDER " Controversy about the Holocaust and slave labor"

Do you want a fucking screenshot?

https://imgoat.com/uploads/369853df76/33499.png

You LYING. DISHONEST. KIKE.

TruthSeeker4 ago

So, you complain about expecting you to read a book and expect me to go through the complete version history of the Wikipedia article? It seems to be from 2015! I'm not even sure if I can believe you that it is in the version history from this dubious link to a internet archive clone. If it is, I'm pretty sure it was added by some Anti-Jew guy like you, who quickly captured it, before it was removed again because it is wrong and has no citation.

Crensch ago

So, you complain about expecting you to read a book and expect me to go through the complete version history of the Wikipedia article?

YOU LINKED IT. It was YOUR FUCKING LINK you complete and utter retard. It's on YOU to understand and know your own sources.

Jesus fucking christ, are you a nigger? I've not seen this level of shitty reasoning in quite some time.

It seems to be from 2015! I'm not even sure if I can believe you that it is in the version history from this dubious link to a internet archive clone. If it is, I'm pretty sure it was added by some Anti-Jew guy like you, who quickly captured it, before it was removed again because it is wrong and has no citation.

*idiot links to wikipedia

*idiot doesn't like link to wikipedia and accuses me of editing it

TruthSeeker4 ago

YOUR FUCKING LINK

No it's not. I linked to the current article which has a citation of the book since you don't seem to want to read the book. But I no longer think you lied on intention. But you just view websites through archive.is for some reason. The current page looks like this: https://imgur.com/0PkEkda

Crensch ago

No it's not. I linked to the current article which has a citation of the book since you don't seem to want to read the book.

You linked to a wikipedia article. You don't like the fact that wikipedia can be edited. Time for you to accept responsibility.

But I no longer think you lied on intention.

You still don't understand why wikipedia isn't a good fucking source for something as politically charged as the holohoax.

But you just view websites through archive.is for some reason.

Yeah, because I don't trust kikes to not hyperlink something under the link and get me to go to a phishing website or some shit..

The current page looks like this:

You don't really get it, do you?

Even if my link was from a different edit of the fucking page, it was still just as legitimate as what you're linking me to.

Are people where you're from really stupid enough to not understand these kinds of things?

But even more importantly:

YOUR LINK ONLY SPEAKS ABOUT BAD WORKING CONDITIONS. NOT THE FUCKING HOLOCAUST CLAIM THAT HAS BEEN FORCED ON GERMANS AND AMERICANS BY KIKES FOR DECADES

TruthSeeker4 ago

Say about me what you want but you haven't provided a single piece of evidence for you're hypothesis that the holocaust didn't happen. While on the other hand, as far as I know, all professional historians, regardless of their country, agree that it did happen. And contrary to predicting the future, knowing about the past is quite achievable.

Crensch ago

Say about me what you want but you haven't provided a single piece of evidence for you're hypothesis that the holocaust didn't happen.

The holocaust is the claim. The default is that nothing happened. I've offered you TWICE now, the opportunity to present what part(s) of the holocaust you think happened, and you've decided not to do so.

While on the other hand, as far as I know, all professional historians, regardless of their country, agree that it did happen.

I don't believe this one fucking bit.

And contrary to predicting the future, knowing about the past is quite achievable.

Of course it is, that's why you won't present what facet(s) of the holocaust you actually think happened. Hell, you can't even differentiate between labor camps and a mass genocide, given your comments here.

TruthSeeker4 ago

Holocaust means mass homocide, of course.

So the default thing is to assume there hasn't been any history at all? We have evidence for the holocaust but not for the opposite.

Na,na I don't believe this, I don't believe that. :-P Who cares what you believe? You're still wrong.

Crensch ago

Holocaust means mass homocide, of course.

Yet your supporting links only support labor camps. Why link them if they don't support your mass killing?

So the default thing is to assume there hasn't been any history at all?

No, faggot. The default is that nothing of note happened. To ANY claim. Do you not even know basic logic? Do they not teach logic where you come from? It would make sense, since your entire presence here has been one seemingly drunken illogical lurch to the next.

We have evidence for the holocaust but not for the opposite.

No, you don't.

Na,na I don't believe this, I don't believe that. :-P How cares what you believe?

Apparently you don't understand how arguments work. If I don't believe your CLAIM, then it's on you to support your claim well enough to convince me that your CLAIM is correct.

I'd ask if you dropped out of school, but I'm starting to think you went to school for "Women's studies" or something.

You're still wrong.

You literally cannot even present a single claim about the Holocaust that you think you can support.

This ENTIRE TIME you haven't done so, so I, and anyone reading this would conclude that you cannot.

TruthSeeker4 ago

Whatever man, I already wasted my day on you. I could and should have done more productive things with it than trying to argue with a holocaust denialist and try to take him seriously. Obviously you don't have anything better to do than stay on voat.co all day, every day. So bye, I tried. I'm going back to ignoring you idiots. Have a nice life and try not to kill anybody!

Crensch ago

Whatever man, I already wasted my day on you.

Not one claim about the holocaust will you present and defend. Not one.

I could and should have done more productive things with it than trying to argue with a holocaust denialist and try to take him seriously.

Not even one claim about the holocaust. This is the level of confidence you have in your position. Not. One.

Obviously you don't have anything better to do than stay on voat.co all day, every day.

Not. One.

So bye, I tried. I'm going back to ignoring you idiots. Have a nice life and try not to kill anybody!

Can't present and defend even ONE claim of the holocaust.