the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.
Copied directly from the DOJ.
"Copied directly from the DOJ."
okay. prove it by doing it. you just said it was legal.
Posted automatically (#40078) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
view the rest of the comments →
Decidueye ago
Hang yourself from the very gallows you're a rousing up a mob to make. Why did you dare me to post pics of nude kids?
theoldones ago
becuase you just said
"Copied directly from the DOJ."
okay. prove it by doing it. you just said it was legal.
go ahead, post that naked kid pic, we can wait.
EDIT: anyone following dortexs spam links, please visit here for clarification . DORTEX IS A LYING FUCKING SNAKE, AND A SERIAL SPAMMER
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/alts comment by @Dortex.
Posted automatically (#40078) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.