You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

sinclair ago

I have little kids. This is kinda strange to see someone solicit naked kid pics. Not really sure what to think of that overall. I see he's trying to make a point, like a dare. Wrong kind of way to "prove" anything I think. Just looks like someone trying to trick someone into sending dirty kid pics. Really weird.

theoldones ago

I see he's trying to make a point, like a dare.

and you understand the situation fully then.

when i get shit done i just get it done.

sinclair ago

Yah, I think the pictures have to be suggestive. Like those ones lately in the media with that kids clothing company coming under fire for suggestive poses.

I saw those and said, "ya, they're pandering to pedophiles, not parents who buy kid's clothes". If you think your kid is sexy, you have deep seated mental problems. That shit bugs every parent I've met.

theoldones ago

"Aged did nothing wrong because the kid had clothes on"

pretty much fucking much, yeah. its goddamn clear what his intentions are and were.

sinclair ago

Maybe they didn't have any evidence to present?

theoldones ago

if they'd had CP lying around and posted it, that would immediately violate the rules on the website, but we would also directly know who had smut and who didn't, and thus who to "deal with".

Dortex ago

You know, this is known as a "confession" in the criminal justice system

theoldones ago

"entrapment". "sting operation". "bait". you idiot.

rebuttal, go read it, fuck off.

Decidueye ago

You're just providing proof of intent to qualify it as solicitation.

Dortex ago

"entrapment". "sting operation". "bait".

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6b0ftfKFEJg

theoldones ago

go read my rebuttal and go kill yourself.

i have nothing more to discuss.