"yeah, i'm a gamer. five minutes ago i pulled out my dick to an underage character and came so hard my ejaculate hit the mouse button and upvoted that post"
sexual fucking degenerates.
stop jacking off in public, and go hide in the corner to do that shit!
WE DON'T WANT YOUR FUCKING PORN! fucking creepy sexual weirdos whose main dealer is a known pedophile, makes me fucking sick to my stomach
go visit the fucking hentai and loli subs if that's what you want to see, keep it the fuck out of this place.
view the rest of the comments →
frenemy ago
i disagree. it was a bad move down a slippery slope. censorship is censorship.
you have had a justice boner for aged for months. last time you did this shit, putt said it was allowed even if he didn't like it. then you had a nervous breakdown. now it seems that it just takes is putt agreeing that he doesn't like content to get a user banned from a system sub. i think that's a huge step backwards. definitely not in line with the spirit of the site. not unless we are no longer about free speech.
honestly, this whole thing was badly handled.
sguevar ago
Unfortunately I disagree with your position.
The reason why I say this is because even if the posts are about gaming characters it is not related to gaming because it is not about the games perse but the "art" (quotes are because the known pedophile u/Aged is just posting images that are in ost of them sexualized kid characters) work of those games.
Said user can go ahead and post his degenerate content on the subverse that is for posting lolicom.
Rule 1 - Submissions must be related to gaming.
Art work is not related to gaming.
u/Aged was spamming continuous lolicom images without generating discussion at all about a game in specific. He was in fact posting disposable content.
frenemy ago
all the content you don't like is disposable. to you.
how on earth are his posts not covered by that blanket statement? how much are you willing to twist words instead of just making up a new rule? why is that so hard to admit? maybe v/gaming needs a new rule.... but banning a user for not really doing anything other than be mildly annoying is a shitty precedent.
sguevar ago
No discussion generated by the user that was spamming pictures of lolicom and were not gaming related.
Art work is not related to gaming. Why is it so hard for you to understand?
Nobody is twisting words here. I basing my entire premise on the rules of the subverse. Art doesn't equate to gaming.
Why are you projecting your stubbornness to others? How is art work related to gaming?
The user was spamming. All subverses are to respect the Voat global rules. The user wasn't respecting the spam rule. Got banned for spamming. You can check the ban log and see the reason.
frenemy ago
the artwork was of gaming characters. it was relevant to the sub. you can complain he was spamming but it doesn't hold a lot of water. i've seen no proof the v/gaming has suffered at all for it... other than this shit, obviously. i think we should err on the side of free speech here. all that requires is making a rule that fixes the problem without specifically targeting that one user. if fan art isn't wanted in v/gaming then make that a rule. done. no free speech issues, no complaints. it's like people are trying to make this hard on purpose.
sguevar ago
Still not gaming related.
No it wasn't. If the sub had the rule specifying that art work is included then yes. Gaming is about playing games, describing the games, the updates of said games, news about the games, espors, new techs to play the game, etc.
Art work is not about gaming.
Now had the user initiated a discussion like how is art work related to gaming or something like that one could argue that the discussion is related to gaming because of the fact that is expressing the relevance of the art work in the game development. But what the user was doing wasn't related to gaming at all and it was spamming.
According to your perception of the matter but a majority of the sub users do not agree with you.
Spamming doesn't necessarily means it hurts the sub but it can be as you stated middly annoying.
We do. I do personally defend the fact that as his posts are legal he is more than welcome to post them on the lolicom subs. Even if I dislike his degenerate nature, he has specifics subs to post that shit there. Why coming here to take advantage of a sub that has a lot of users if not to create discord amongst the users?
The user didn't respect neither rule 1 nor spam global rule. Additionally he never generated any discussion thread in here. He simply was spamming pictures all over the place, because that is what he does.
Fan art doesn't equate to gaming. Fan art = art work, have the user create a subverse about fan art and so on and so forth.
Actually the one making it complicated is you. I don't see why is it so hard to understand that the content the user was posting wasn't gaming related as well as I don't see why they user doesn't create a sub for fan art. The fact that you defend a known pedophile here at Voat to allow hiim to spam a subverse with his degenerate content just because he is posting lolicom pictures of game related characters is beyond me.
He never addresses for example why those characters are his favorites or why he prefers them to play with. He simply spams pictures without generating discussion besides the fact that we don't appreciate his degeneracy here.
BlueDrache ago
Akshually ...
Akshually ...
Going to chime in here and disagree with your statements. I don't even like lolicon, but if the content of the post was of videogame characters, then it's topical.
sguevar ago
Ok then please explain how is artwork related to gaming?
BlueDrache ago
Games are literally a work of art that you can play.
sguevar ago
Please define what is gaming.
BlueDrache ago
Ok, bud. You need to stop.